The US is retreating from international cooperation, cutting support for free media abroad and reducing financial aid. Russia and China are spending up to £8bn on their global media activities to boost their influence. Amid these global tensions, the UK government recognises the dangers of a western retreat – but is struggling to fund a response.
With such huge shifts in world politics, it is no wonder that some politicians fear the west is losing the “soft power” battle – a phrase coined by the academic Joseph Nye in the 1980s to describe the ability to influence other nations through attraction and persuasion rather than coercion.
While it may seem a frustratingly abstract concept, recent world events suggest its use has very real consequences. China was viewed favourably by 29% of people studied across 18 countries in 2021. After huge soft power efforts, the figure has now increased to 40%, according to a study by theBBC and Tapestry Research.
The study separately surveyed a group across 10 countries made up of people involved in business decisions. Among that group, China’s favourability had increased from 39% to 51%. It found that watching CGTN or RT, the respective state broadcasters of China and Russia, made viewers more favourable to those countries.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump has been defunding independent media overseas such asVoice of America, known for delivering independent journalism to countries with restricted press freedoms.Overseas aidis being targeted.
Over a longer period, Britain’s traditionally potent soft power has been misfiring. “The UK’s soft power has been in decline roughly since Brexit, for the last 10 years, but we’re still a top-tier player,” said Jonathan McClory, an expert on soft power who recently authored a report on the issue for Labour Together, a thinktank with close ties to Downing Street.
“We haven’t managed to establish a compelling narrative of who we are and where we’re going since Brexit … We’ve got a proper change in government, which gives the opportunity to do that. We have a willing audience, but we have to say what it is we’re good at and act accordingly,” McClory said.
UK ministers have recognised the urgency of the situation and also realise the opportunity for Britain’s economy in fostering stronger international ties. The government set up asoft power councilearlier this year and populated it with figures from across media, education, defence and beyond. It was a widely welcomed initiative, plugging in soft power to the top of government. A formal strategy is expected to follow this autumn.
However, there is also a conflict at the heart of government. It is clear to most insiders that even the best-designed strategy will require funding. Key soft power institutions are struggling to cope with financial pressures, most notably theBBC World Service, the British Council and universities.
Members of the newly formed soft power council are treading carefully, conscious that many ministers are sympathetic to the need for funding but have a tough task in securing it from the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, who is facing amyriad of pressing demands.
Tristram Hunt, the director of the Victoria and Albert Museum and a member of the council, said: “There is an importance in a growing age of autocracy to have that voice [of liberal, democratic values] heard. Budgets are strained and it’s hard. We can’t pick up all the slack left by a retreating America. But if we believe in these values, it’s important to be on the front foot with them as far as we can.”
Others on the council are more bullish, arguing that the US retreat creates a strategic opening for Britain. “We have this incredible opportunity,” said Neil Mendoza, who served as a culture commissioner under the previous government. “You have a threat on the one hand but also this opportunity because America has withdrawn. It is also cheap as chips – and can work in close partnership with hard power. Why wouldn’t you invest in soft power?”