Arguing with your partner? Done the right way it can be a skill for couples, say therapists

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Therapists Highlight Constructive Arguing as a Key Skill for Couples"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In long-term relationships, disagreements are often inevitable, but therapists suggest that arguing, when done correctly, can be a vital skill for couples. Joanna Harrison, a couples therapist, emphasizes that many people mistakenly believe that a lack of conflict signifies a healthy relationship. However, avoiding conflict can lead to unresolved feelings and resentments. Healthy arguments can actually serve as a necessary outlet for couples to address everyday annoyances, such as household chores or parenting responsibilities. Experts argue that couples who engage in constructive arguments are more likely to remain together in the long run compared to those who avoid conflict altogether. This perspective challenges the notion that conflict is inherently negative and highlights its potential to foster deeper understanding between partners.

To improve conflict resolution skills, therapists recommend several strategies. Linda Blair, a clinical psychologist, stresses that couples should focus on understanding each other rather than 'winning' an argument. Practical tips include choosing appropriate settings for discussions, such as going for dinner or taking a walk, which can help maintain a calmer atmosphere. Harrison advises couples to view arguments as opportunities to learn about their partner's values and feelings. After a disagreement, it is important for partners to revisit the conversation with curiosity and a willingness to understand the underlying issues. By following guidelines such as timing discussions carefully, taking responsibility for one’s feelings, and avoiding contempt, couples can enhance their ability to navigate conflicts effectively, ultimately leading to a stronger and more resilient relationship.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article centers on the dynamics of conflict in romantic relationships, particularly emphasizing that arguing, when managed correctly, can be a beneficial skill for couples. It draws on the example of George and Amal Clooney, who claim to have never argued in their long marriage, prompting a discussion among therapists about the nature of conflict in relationships.

Purpose of the Publication

The main intent of this article appears to be to normalize conflict in romantic partnerships, positioning it as a healthy and necessary aspect of long-term relationships. By referencing the Clooneys' seemingly perfect marriage, the article aims to challenge the myth that a lack of conflict equates to a healthy relationship, suggesting instead that constructive arguments can foster communication and understanding.

Public Perception

The article seeks to reshape the perception of arguing among couples. It encourages readers to see arguments not as signs of dysfunction but as opportunities for growth and resolution. This perspective could resonate with many couples who might feel guilty about their conflicts, thus fostering a sense of acceptance around the normalcy of disagreements.

Hidden Aspects

There does not appear to be any obvious hidden agendas within the article. However, the emphasis on therapy and conflict resolution might suggest a broader push towards mental health awareness and the importance of professional guidance in personal relationships. This could be an attempt to advocate for the mental health profession within the context of relationship dynamics.

Manipulative Elements

The article does not seem overtly manipulative, but it does use language that might influence readers to reconsider their views on arguing. The way it frames conflict as a skill may encourage couples to seek help or resources, indirectly promoting therapy and counseling services.

Degree of Truthfulness

The assertions made in the article are grounded in psychological insights from therapists, lending credibility to the claims. The balance it strikes between acknowledging unhealthy arguments and promoting the idea of constructive conflict suggests a nuanced understanding of relationship dynamics.

Community Appeal

This article is likely to resonate with individuals in long-term relationships who may struggle with conflict. It appeals to those seeking to improve their communication skills and those who value psychological insights into personal relationships.

Potential Impact on Society and Economy

On a societal level, promoting the idea that conflict can be healthy may lead to more open discussions about relationship issues, potentially reducing the stigma around seeking help. Economically, this could benefit sectors such as therapy and relationship counseling services, as more couples may seek professional guidance to manage their conflicts.

Stock Market Implications

While the article itself does not directly influence stock markets, the emphasis on mental health and relationship counseling could impact companies in the wellness and therapy sectors. Stocks of businesses offering relationship resources or mental health services may see a positive trend as public interest in these areas grows.

Geopolitical Relevance

This article does not have immediate geopolitical implications; however, it reflects broader social trends regarding mental health and relationships that can influence societal stability, which indirectly ties into global issues like family structures and community well-being.

Use of AI in Writing

There is no clear indication that AI was used in the writing of this article. The style and tone suggest a human touch, particularly in the nuanced discussion of relationships. If AI were involved, it might have assisted in structuring the article or generating ideas, but the personal insights shared seem authentically human.

Overall Reliability

The article's reliance on expert opinions and its balanced treatment of the topic lend it a degree of reliability. It presents a perspective that encourages healthy communication in relationships, which can be beneficial for readers seeking guidance in their personal lives.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Why can’t the dirty plates go straight into the dishwasher? Whose turn is it to pick up the kids? And why do you insist on doing that thing you do when you know how much it annoys me? No honestly, don’t worry, I’mfine.

Perhaps – if you are part of a long-term couple – that kind of conversation sounds familiar. Or perhaps you areGeorgeandAmal Clooney, and you never, ever argue. That, at least, wasthe actor’s boastthis week to a US morning show: in almost 12 years of marriage, he said, he and his lawyer wife have never had a single argument. “We’re trying to find something to argue about,” he joked.

Can it really be possible to commit to someone long enough for the pheromones to wear off and not, every now and then, have a row about money, parenting or who was supposed to sort the car tax? And even if it is possible – is it healthy? The Clooneys’ blissful marriage may be one thing, but for the rest of us, say experts, arguing need not be such a bad thing – so long as we’re doing it right.

“People are drawn into thinking that lots of conflict is a sign that there’s something wrong with a relationship, and an absence of conflict means there isn’t something wrong,” says the couples therapist Joanna Harrison, whose book on the subject is titledFive Arguments All Couples (Need to) Have, and Why the Washing Up Matters. “But often when conflict is avoided, those feelings are building up and creating resentments or finding outlets elsewhere, and that can be problematic.”

Obviously, not every domestic dispute is a positive one. “Arguments that leave people feeling unsafe or put people at risk, or that are hostile, frequent or unresolved, particularly if there are children – these are not healthy arguments,” she says. But when it comes to the everyday conflicts and annoyances of a long-term relationship, thrashing out the issues that wind you up about each other is often not just normal, but necessary.

“Actually, arguing is a great skill for couples,” agrees Stefan Walters of the psychotherapy service Harley Therapy. Research has shown that over many years, “couples who do argue actually end up staying together much more than couples who don’t”, he says.

The good news is we can get better at it, he says. “It’s a skill that we need to practise and learn. For many of us, unfortunately, it wasn’t modelled for us very effectively in our childhood. We may have seen parents who were either avoidant with each other or who just shouted at each other. But we can practise and we develop tools that help make that better.”

But how? The most important thing – though by no means the most easy – is to stop trying to win, says theclinical psychologistandagony auntLinda Blair. “This is not a contest. This is [about] how to understand each other better. When we get emotional, we think in black and white: we win or we lose, we’re right or wrong. You need to find the compromise.”

A few practical things can make the process easier, she says. Blair often suggests warring couples have their heated debate somewhere public: “Go for dinner, for example, because you’re less likely to start shouting. When we stay calmer, we’re able to see the grey between the blacks and the whites.”

Another tip is to go for a walk or talk side by side, so you’re not making eye contact – “that, in all mammals, is taken as a threat” – and try to approach things when you are both calm, says Blair. “All those things will, without your trying, [help you] come up with a solution which is not perfect for either of you, but the closest you can get.”

Ultimately, having a good blowout can be a way of building up trust in each other, says Harrison. She advises viewing a row as “an opportunity to learn something about what your partner cares about”.

That will include making a bit of effort to repair things once everyone has calmed down. “After the dust has settled a bit, perhaps you can go back in and be curious. What was that really about? Try to be a bit of a detective about it. ‘I’m struggling to understand what it was about leaving my shoes there that made you so upset with me. Was it just about the shoes?’”

DO

Choose your moment. “Timing is everything when you want to talk about a difficult topic,” says Harrison. Instead of blurting out a grievance when everyone is busy, she says, “have a conversation about having a conversation. Is there a time that we could talk about this issue?”

Be curious. “Be sure you are asking questions, you’re not trying to dominate,” says Blair.

Take responsibility. “Don’t say, ‘you make me angry.’” says Blair. “Say, ‘I feel angry when you …’”

Take a step back if things are becoming too heated. “If things feel like they’re really, escalating, that’s a sign to pause the conversation that is no longer a conversation,” says Harrison. Agree to come back to it later when everyone has cooled down.

DON’T

Try to win all the time. Try to make the problem your mutual enemy.

Store up grievances as ammunition to use later. If now isn’t a good time to thrash things out, “I think there should be a promise that it’s done within 24 hours,” says Walters.

While it can be helpful to model conflict resolution for your children, says Harrison, don’t have blazing rows in front of them.

Don’t show contempt, even in the heat of the moment, as it’s much harder to repair in the aftermath, says Blair. “You’re not better than they are”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian