Are we doing enough to save Earth from a devastating asteroid strike?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Scientists Assess Risks and Preparedness Against Potential Asteroid Impacts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The threat of asteroid impacts on Earth, often dramatized in films, is a serious concern for scientists who are actively monitoring and developing strategies to mitigate such risks. Recent estimates indicated that asteroid YR4 2024 had a 3.1% chance of colliding with Earth in 2032, although this probability was later revised down to 0.0017%. New data suggests that it may actually be more likely to strike the moon, which could still pose risks by sending debris towards Earth, affecting satellites and astronauts. Another significant asteroid, 99942 Apophis, will make a close approach to Earth in April 2029, prompting the United Nations to declare that year as the international year of planetary defense. Historical precedents, such as the asteroid impact that contributed to the extinction of the dinosaurs, underscore the potential catastrophic consequences of such events, even if they are statistically rare, occurring approximately every 10 to 100 million years for massive asteroids.

The scientific community is increasingly equipped to detect and track near-Earth objects, with advancements such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory expected to significantly increase the number of known asteroids. NASA is also developing the Near-Earth Object Surveyor, a space telescope specifically designed to identify hazardous asteroids. Recent missions, such as NASA's DART, which successfully altered the orbit of the asteroid Dimorphos, demonstrate the potential for active planetary defense strategies. Experts believe that while the threat of catastrophic asteroid impacts exists, our capabilities to monitor and respond to these threats are improving rapidly. As Chris Lintott from the University of Oxford states, the more asteroids we find, the better we can prepare for potential collisions, leading to a sense of increased safety compared to previous eras. In conclusion, while asteroid impacts are a genuine concern, the scientific community is making strides in detection and defense, ensuring that we are better prepared than ever before.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It is a scenario beloved of Hollywood: a huge asteroid, several miles wide, is on a collision course with Earth. Scientists check and recheck their calculations but there is no mistake – civilisation is facing a cataclysmic end unless the space rock can be deflected.

It may sound like science fiction, but it is a threat that is being taken seriously by scientists.

Earlier this year, researchers estimated that asteroid YR4 2024 had a 3.1% chance of hitting Earth in 2032, before revising that likelihood down to0.0017%. This week, new data suggested it wasmore likely to hit the moon, with a probability of 4.3%.

If that happens, the 53- to 67-metre (174ft-220ft) asteroid previously called a “city killer” will launch hundreds of tonnes of debris towards our planet, posing a risk to satellites, spacecraft and astronauts.

Before that, in April 2029, 99942 Apophis – an asteroid larger than the Eiffel Tower – will be visible to the naked eye when it passes within 32,000km of Earth. This attention-grabbing close encounter has prompted the UN to designate 2029 as the international year of planetary defence.

When it comes to apocalyptic asteroid strikes, there is precedent, of course. Most scientists believe such an event hastened the demise of non-avian dinosaurs 66m years ago.

“This is something that happens,” said Colin Snodgrass, a professor of planetary astronomy at the University of Edinburgh. “Not very often, but it is something that happens. And it’s something that we could potentially do something about.”

As Chris Lintott, a professor of astrophysics at the University of Oxford, told the UK parliament’s science, innovation and technology committee this week, the risk posed by an asteroid originating beyond our solar system is minimal. Instead, he said, the greater threat comes from those in our cosmic back yard.

“Most asteroids in the solar system exist in the asteroid belt, which is between Mars and Jupiter, but they become disrupted, usually by encounters with either of those planets, and they can move into orbits that cross the Earth,” said Lintott, who presents the long-running BBC astronomy series The Sky at Night. “Then it’s just a case of whether we’re in the wrong place at the wrong time.”

The chances of an enormous asteroid – the type that did for the dinosaurs – hitting Earth is admittedly low. “We think there’s one of these every 10m to 100m years, probably,” Lintott told the Guardian. “So I think you’d be right to ignore that when you decide whether to get up on a Thursday morning or not.”

Snodgrass said there were “precisely four” asteroids big enough and close enough to Earth to be considered “dino-killers”, and added: “We know where they are, and they’re not coming anywhere near us.”

But damage can also be done by smaller asteroids. According to Nasa, space rocks measuring about one to 20 metres across collided with Earth’s atmosphere resulting in fireballs556 times over 20 years.

Many collisions haveoccurred over the oceans, but not all. “Chelyabinsk is the best example,” Lintott said. In 2013, ahouse-sized space rock– thought to have been about 20 metres across – exploded in the air above the Russian city with aforce of nearly 30 Hiroshima bombs, producing an airburst that caused significant damage and hundreds of injuries, mostly from broken glass.

Less dramatically, in February 2021 a space rock thought to have been just tens of centimetres across broke up in Earth’s atmosphere, with fragments landing in the Cotswold town of Winchcombe in the UK. Thankfully, the damage was confined to asplat mark on a driveway.

The types of asteroids we should perhaps be most concerned about are those about 140 metres across. According to Nasa, asteroids around that size are thought to hit Earth aboutonce every 20,000 yearsand have the potential to cause huge destruction and mass casualties. The space agency has a congressional mandate to detect and track near-Earth objects of this size and larger, and a suite of new technological advances are helping them do just that.

On Monday, thefirst images from the Vera C Rubin observatoryin Chile were released to the public. This telescope is expected to more than triple the number of known near-earth objects, from about 37,000 to 127,000, over a 10-year period. In just 10 hours of observations, it found seven previously unspotted asteroids that will pass close to the Earth – though none are expected to hit.

Also in the offing, though not planned for launch before 2027, is Nasa’s near-Earth object (Neo) surveyor. Armed with an array of infrared detectors, this is “the first space telescope specifically designed to detect asteroids and comets that may be potential hazards to Earth”, the agency says.

Lintott said: “Between those two, we should find everything down to about 140 metres.” He said such observations should give scientists up to 10 years’ warning of a potential collision.

The European Space Agency (Esa) is planning anear-Earth object mission in the infrared(Neomir) satellite. Slated for launch in the early 2030s, this will help detect asteroids heading towards Earth that are at least 20 metres in diameter and obscured by the sun.

Assessing the emerging capabilities, Edward Baker, the planetary defence lead at the UK’s National Space Operations Centre (NSpOC) at RAF High Wycombe, said: “I think we’re in a good place. I can’t see a situation like [the film]Don’t Look Upmaterialising at all – though I wouldn’t mind being portrayed by Leonardo DiCaprio.”

As our ability to spot near-Earth asteroids increases, Lintott said, we should get used to hearing about asteroids like YR4 2024, which initially seem more likely to hit Earth before the risk rapidly falls towards zero. He described the shifting probabilities as similar to when a footballer takes a free kick.

“The moment they kick it, [it looks like] it could go anywhere,” he said. “And then as it moves, you get more information. So you’re like: ‘Oh, it might go in the goal,’ and then it inevitably becomes really clear that it’s going to miss.”

Of course, scientists aren’t just monitoring the risks to Earth. They are also making plans to protect it. In 2022, Nasa crashed a spacecraft into a small, harmless asteroid called Dimorphos that orbits a larger rock called Didymos to test whether it would be possible to shift its path. TheDart mission was a success, reducing Dimorphos’s 12-hour orbit around Didymos by 32 minutes.

In 2024, Esa launched afollow-up to Nasa’s Dart mission, called Hera. This will reach Dimorphos in 2026 and carry out a close-up “crash site investigation”. It will survey the Dart impact crater, probe how effectively momentum was transferred in the collision and record a host of other measurements.

Esa hopes this will provide crucial insights that can be used to make deliberate Dart-style impacts a reliable technique for safeguarding Earth.

“Dart was much more effective than anyone expected it to be,” Lintott said. “And presumably that’s something to do with the structure of the asteroid. I think we need to know whether Dart just got lucky with its target, or whether all near-Earth asteroids are like this.”

For the most part, scientists say the threat of an asteroid strike does not keep them up at night. “We’re safer than we’ve ever been and we’re about to get a lot safer, because the more of these things we find, the more we can spot them on the way in,” Lintott said.

As Esa has quipped on its merchandise: “Dinosaurs didn’t have a space agency.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian