Antoinette Lattouf wins unlawful termination case against the ABC as federal court delivers judgment

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Federal Court Rules in Favor of Antoinette Lattouf in Unlawful Termination Case Against ABC"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a significant ruling, the federal court has determined that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) unlawfully terminated Antoinette Lattouf, a casual broadcaster, in violation of the Fair Work Act. Justice Darryl Rangiah found that Lattouf's removal from her role on a Sydney radio program was linked to her political opinions expressed through a social media post regarding the Gaza conflict. Specifically, Lattouf shared an Instagram post from Human Rights Watch asserting that Israel had utilized starvation as a weapon of war in Gaza. The court concluded that her termination was an adverse action based on her political beliefs, which is prohibited under the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the ABC was ordered to pay Lattouf $70,000 in compensation for the unlawful termination that occurred just three days into her scheduled five-day hosting stint on Sydney Mornings.

During the court proceedings, it was noted that while Lattouf's claims regarding racial discrimination were dismissed, the judge found no evidence supporting her allegations of a pro-Israel campaign orchestrated to oust her from the program. The ABC argued that Lattouf was removed due to her failure to adhere to a directive not to post about contentious issues while employed by the network. However, Justice Rangiah clarified that Lattouf was only advised against posting controversial content, and she was not formally directed to refrain from such expressions. The emotional reaction in the courtroom was palpable as Lattouf and her legal team celebrated the verdict, which underscored the importance of protecting employees' rights to express their political opinions without fear of retribution from their employers. This ruling not only impacts Lattouf's career but also sets a precedent regarding the protection of political expression in the workplace.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The ABC breached the Fair Work Act when it removed casual broadcaster Antoinette Lattouf from a Sydney radio program because of a social media post about Gaza, justice Darryl Rangiah has found in a federal court judgment.

Rangiah upheld Lattouf’s claim heard in the federal court in February that she was unlawfully terminated in December 2023 when her on-air shifts were cut short three days into a five-day stint hosting Sydney Mornings.

“The respondent, theAustralian Broadcasting Corporation(the ABC) contravened s772(1) of theFair Work Act 2009(Cth) (the FWA) by terminating the employment of the applicant, Antoinette Lattouf, for reasons including that she held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza,” Rangiah wrote in the judgment.

But the court found Lattouf was not terminated because of her race or national extraction.

“The evidence does not support Ms Lattouf’s claims that [David] Anderson, [Ita Buttrose, [Chris] Oliver-Taylor and [Ben] Latimer made or materially contributed to a decision to terminate her employment for reasons that included her race or national extraction.”

The court ordered that the ABC pay Lattouf compensation of $70,000.

The Fair Work Act says an employer may not take adverse action against an employee because of their political opinion or race.

Before the judge read aloud a summary of the judgment, he handed out the full written reasons for his decision to the lawyers involved. There was a frantic flurry of papers being turned as the lawyers flipped through to find out if their side had won the day, even as Justice Darryl Rangiah was still describing the context of the case.

After 10 seconds of reading, one of Lattouf’s barristers, Philip Boncardo, turned to Lattouf behind him and nodded - she had won. She turned incredulous to lawyer Josh Bornstein, sitting next to her, who confirmed the news and Lattouf turned to her husband, sitting in the gallery behind her and mouth: “We won.”

Lattouf hugged the lawyers sitting beside her, then bowed her head and cried, as Rangiah continued laying out the history of the events at the heart of the case.

Lattouf was removed after she shared an Instagram post from Human Rights Watch that said Israel had used starvation as a “weapon of war” in Gaza.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

Her case argued that she was the subject of a pro-Israel lobbying campaign, the purpose of which was to remove her from air because of her social media support of Palestinian human rights.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

However, the ABC said she was removed for not following a “direction” not to post about the war while working for the ABC.

Justice Rangiah found Lattouf was “merely provided with advice that it would be best not to post anything controversial about the war” and was not given a direction not to post.

More details to follow

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian