‘Another snake-oil salesman’s pitch’: US workers wary of Trump’s steel deal

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Workers Express Skepticism Over Trump's Support for Nippon Steel's Acquisition of US Steel"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Former President Donald Trump has recently shifted his stance on Nippon Steel's $14 billion acquisition of US Steel, once opposing the deal due to national security concerns but now endorsing it as a pivotal moment for the struggling US steel industry. During a rally in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, Trump proclaimed that the region would transform from a 'rust belt' into a 'golden belt' as a result of the deal, which he claims will create tens of thousands of jobs. However, many workers are expressing skepticism regarding these promises. David McCall, president of the United Steel Workers union, emphasized the importance of seeing tangible commitments rather than relying on political rhetoric. Doug May, a veteran steel worker, echoed this sentiment, criticizing Trump’s inconsistent messaging and labeling his support for the deal as a mere 'snake-oil salesman’s pitch' aimed at benefiting corporate executives rather than the workers themselves.

As details surrounding the deal remain sparse, workers are left questioning their job security and the future of their plants. Mikayla Prescott, a worker at the Irvin site, voiced concerns about whether the acquisition would result in genuine improvements or simply further uncertainties. The United Steel Workers union, which was not involved in the discussions regarding the acquisition, has raised alarms about Nippon Steel's history of violating US trade laws. While US Steel has characterized the transaction as an acquisition, the union's skepticism is rooted in past experiences, particularly regarding Trump's promises to revive the industry. Critics, including May, argue that the cyclical nature of the steel market, rather than Trump's policies, has driven changes in employment at plants like Granite City, and they question the long-term viability of Trump's commitments to the industry, especially in the context of union relations and labor rights.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a critical view of Donald Trump's recent support for Nippon Steel's $14 billion takeover of US Steel, contrasting his previous opposition to the deal. It captures the skepticism of steelworkers and industry veterans regarding the promises made by Trump, emphasizing a long-standing distrust born from their experiences. The narrative hints at a disconnect between political promises and the realities faced by workers in the steel industry.

Public Sentiment and Trust Issues

The article reflects a general wariness among US steelworkers towards Trump's assurances, highlighting their history of contract negotiations that foster a cautious approach to political claims. The quote from David McCall, president of United Steel Workers, underscores this sentiment, suggesting that trust must be earned through concrete actions rather than verbal commitments. The skepticism is echoed by Doug May, who characterizes Trump’s statements as manipulative and reminiscent of a “snake-oil salesman.”

Economic and Job Creation Claims

Trump’s assertion that the deal will create tens of thousands of jobs is met with skepticism from workers, who express concern over job security and plant improvements. The juxtaposition of Trump’s optimistic rhetoric with workers’ doubts illustrates a broader narrative of disillusionment in the face of promises that may not materialize. The emphasis on job creation serves as a political tool, aimed at gaining support from those directly affected by the industry's challenges.

Impact on Steel Industry and Market Dynamics

With Trump's announcement of doubling tariffs on foreign steel, the article suggests a potential shift in market dynamics. While this move may be framed as beneficial for domestic workers, the underlying implications for the steel industry and global trade relations remain uncertain. The article hints at potential backlash from international partners and the risk of retaliatory measures affecting market stability.

Manipulative Language and Political Strategy

The language used in the article may suggest manipulation, particularly in how Trump’s past positions are depicted as inconsistent. By labeling his approach as flip-flopping and highlighting the skepticism of industry veterans, the article aims to create a narrative that questions the integrity of political promises. This framing could be seen as an effort to sway public opinion against Trump’s administration and its handling of the steel industry.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The credibility of the article appears to be grounded in the firsthand accounts of industry workers and the established history of political maneuvering surrounding trade deals. However, the narrative could be influenced by the writer’s perspective, potentially introducing bias in the portrayal of Trump and his policies. Overall, the article presents a critical viewpoint that aligns with a broader skepticism of political leaders’ promises, particularly in economically sensitive sectors.

In conclusion, the article serves to highlight the deep-seated mistrust among workers in the steel industry towards political promises, particularly those made by Donald Trump regarding the Nippon Steel acquisition. It reflects a cautious optimism overshadowed by a history of unmet expectations, ultimately questioning the feasibility of the proposed benefits.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Donald Trump, once “totally against” Nippon Steel of Japan’s controversial $14bn takeover bid for US Steel, the second largest US steel producer, is now hailing the deal as a turning point for the struggling industry.

“We won’t be able to call this section a rust belt any more,” the US presidentdeclaredat a plant in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, on Friday. “It’ll be a golden belt.”

Workers are not holding their breath as they await details. “Our members know from decades of negotiating contracts: trust nothing until you see it in writing,” David McCall, president of United Steel Workers, said in a statement last week.

And veterans of the sector, which has withered for decades, are dubious.

“This is another snake-oil salesman’s pitch to make him look good and reward the billionaires and millionaire executives and stakeholders for US Steel,” said Doug May, who worked for 43 years as a steel worker at a mill in Granite City, Illinois, from the age of 19.

“He’s a proven flip-flopper. Just look at his trade cases: on again, off again.”

Trump ditched his opposition to the deal – which Joe Bidenblockedin January, citing national security concerns – last week, claiming it would create tens of thousands of jobs.

At Friday’sPennsylvaniarally, the president also announced he was doubling US tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. “This will be yet another BIG jolt of great news for our wonderful steel and aluminum workers,” he later claimed on social media.

As Nippon looks to swoop on US Steel, however, staff are still waiting on clarity.

“Are we still going to be employed when this whole thing goes through, and are there going to be improvements to our plant?” Mikayla Prescott, a worker at the Irvin site where Trump spoke on Friday,told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.

“If it’s not benefiting the workers,” she added, “then what’s the point?”

Following his retirement in 2016, May has followed international trade deals involving steel and watched the negative impacts offoreign steel importson the US industry.

May said the president “recognized [the] disenchantment and anger” over the decline of the US steel industry but expressed distrust and disapproval of Trump’s rhetoric and promises in supporting the deal.

While the deal is said to include a “golden share” that will be issued to the federal government, details have not been disclosed. US Steel hascharacterizedthe deal as an acquisition.

United Steel Workers, which did not participate in the discussions around the acquisition of US Steel, hasnotedNippon Steel has been found to have violated US trade laws in 13 different cases.

The union’s most recent contract with US Steel, signed in 2022 and set to expire at the end of 2026,represents 11,000 workersat the company.

US Steel bought the Granite City plant, where May used to work, out of bankruptcy in 2003. The plant wastemporarily idledfor months in 2009 due to the recession, the first time in the plant’s over 100-year history, and following another idling of the plant in December 2015, US Steel announced in March 2018 it was reopening the plant,citingTrump’s 25% tariffs on steel imports.

“We are once again pouring American steel into the spine of our country,” the president, then in his first term, declared at a rally at Granite City. “You are the ones who are making America great again.”

May disputed Trump, or his tariffs, as the reason for the reopening, which he suggested was a result of the cyclical nature of the industry. In 2016, the US Steel chief executive had said the plant was idled due to market conditions and that it would be brought back when conditions improve.

“Granite City was going to start back up anyway,” said May. “They don’t just flip a switch just because Trump came to town.”

Despite Trump’s promises in 2018 to bring back “hope and prosperity” to Granite City, problems continued. The plant’s blast furnace wasidledpartially in 2019,then its second was idledin late 2023, which US Steelblamedon the autoworkers’ strike at the big three automakers. United Steel Workersarguedthe decision was a targeted attack on unionized workers.

“If Trump really had steel workers’ backs, he wouldn’t be makinganti-union appointmentsto the National Labor Relations Board,” May added. “He wouldn’t bedecimatingOsha [the Occupational Safety and Health Administration]. He wouldn’t be doing everything he’s done: a long list of things that prove that he’s not supportive of unions.”

May said: “The ‘partnership’ that those at the rally are celebrating, despite scant details of investments being shared, could become your very nemesis in a short period of time. Solidarity with USW leadership and members across the country is critical going forward. Once the shit hits the fan, commitments are unfulfilled,non-union electric arc furnace actionswill be used as a contract bargaining weapon and the rally is a forgotten memory.”

There is a “vast difference between public relations and putting commitments in writing”, McCall, the USW president, said in a statement last week. “Issuing press releases and making political speeches is easy. Binding commitments are hard,” he said.

“The devil is always in the details, and that is especially true with a bad actor like Nippon Steel that has again and again violated our trade laws, devastating steel communities in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.”

US Steel did not respond to multiple requests for comment on criticisms from United Steel Workers on the deal.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian