An ugly pack and backs worth paying to watch: Bath have taken us back to the 1990s | Andy Bull

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Bath Rugby's Resurgence Reflects Revival of Historic Identity Amid Challenges"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Bath Rugby has a storied history that dates back to the 1980s and 1990s when the team was a dominant force in English rugby. Under the leadership of coaches like Jack Rowell and Brian Ashton, Bath secured an impressive six league titles in eight years and ten cup victories in twelve. Their crowning achievement came in 1998 when they triumphed over Brive in the European Cup final. However, the club's fortunes waned over the years due to a series of poor decisions, including extravagant signings and a humiliating cross-code challenge against rugby league side Wigan Warriors. As the professional game evolved, Bath struggled to maintain their competitive edge, leading to a prolonged period of mediocrity, much to the disappointment of their loyal fanbase, who have only known the team as underachievers since their last major success in 2008.

In recent years, however, there has been a resurgence under the direction of Johann van Graan, who has emphasized a return to the club's roots and identity. The current squad features a mix of seasoned players and promising academy talents, reflecting both local heritage and strategic recruitment. Despite challenges such as high ticket prices and ongoing disputes over the redevelopment of their home ground, the Rec, Bath Rugby is once again becoming a team that fans are excited to watch. With a gritty playing style and a blend of local and high-profile talent, supporters are optimistic as the team prepares for upcoming matches, including a notable rivalry clash against Leicester at Twickenham. This revival suggests that while Bath Rugby has faced significant trials, the essence of the club and its connection to the local community remain strong, providing a hopeful outlook for the future.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reflects on the state of Bath Rugby, evoking nostalgia for its past glory while juxtaposing it with the current mediocrity of the club. It highlights the significant historical achievements of Bath Rugby during the 1980s and 1990s, aiming to rekindle a sense of pride among fans and the local community. The writer's personal connection to the city adds a layer of emotional depth, suggesting that the club's legacy is more than just statistics; it's intertwined with local identity.

Nostalgia and Identity

The author paints a vivid picture of Bath Rugby's illustrious past, mentioning key players and significant victories. This historical context serves to remind readers of the club's rich heritage, which has, over time, been overshadowed by less impressive performances. The intent seems to be to evoke a sense of nostalgia, encouraging the community to reconnect with their sporting roots and perhaps reignite support for the team.

Current State of Affairs

While the article nostalgically recounts past successes, it does not shy away from addressing the club's current challenges. The mention of poor recent performances and questionable management decisions implies a need for introspection and change. This could be seen as a call to action for the club's management and its fanbase to recognize the need for reform to restore the team's former glory.

Community Engagement

By sharing a personal narrative related to Bath, the journalist appeals to local sentiment. This connection to the community could help foster a greater sense of belonging among readers, particularly those who share similar experiences with the club. The article implicitly encourages a collective response to the club's current situation, urging fans to rally in support of their team.

Manipulative Tendencies

There's a subtle manipulation in the way the author romanticizes the past while critiquing the present. This technique can create a sense of urgency and nostalgia that may pressure the club's management and players to rise to the occasion. By framing the narrative this way, the writer could be seen as attempting to mobilize support for the club, highlighting the disparity between past and present to provoke action.

The overall reliability of the article hinges on its emotional appeal and historical accuracy. While it effectively captures the essence of Bath Rugby's legacy, the narrative is undoubtedly colored by personal sentiment, which may affect objectivity. The appeal to nostalgia can be seen as both a strength and a potential bias, as it emphasizes emotional connections over current realities.

In conclusion, the article serves to remind readers of Bath Rugby's historical significance while urging them to confront the present challenges facing the club. The emotional narrative aims to foster community engagement and support, although it also carries an undercurrent of manipulation through its nostalgic framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The first thing anyone who cares says when they find out you’re a sports journalist is to ask whether or not you were at whichever big game was on that weekend. The second, after you’ve explained, apologetically, that you don’t actually follow football, is usually an awkward pause. There are all sorts of reasons why you may prefer any other sort of sport, but after 20 years of variations on this conversation, I’ve learned that unless you want to come across like someone who insists actually they prefer art-house cinema and free jazz, it’s best to have a straightforward explanation. Mine is that I grew up in Bath.

They do play football in Bath, out at Twerton Park. The club have never been in the Football League (right now they’re in National League South), and most weeks they draw a crowd of around a thousand. Which isn’t so very many more than you’ll find crowded around the stone balustrades of the city’s parade gardens, trying to peer across the weir and see into the Rec when the rugby club have a home game. Bath’s football has always been bad. But in the 80s and 90s Bath’s rugby was so good that the brand still stands for something, even after they have been mediocre for a large part of the past 30 years.

It was Jack Rowell’s team and, after Rowell took the England job, Brian Ashton’s. It was the team of Gareth Chilcott, Victor Ubogu and Graham Dawe, of Andy Robinson, Nigel Redman, John Hall and Martin Haag, of Stuart Barnes, Tony Swift, David Trick, Mike Catt, Jon Callard, Richard Hill, Simon Halliday, Phil de Glanville and Jeremy Guscott, and too many more to name them all. It was the team that won the league six times in eight years and the cup 10 times in 12, and the team who beat Brive, by a point, in the European Cup final in 1998. Which, looking back on it now, was the club’s high-water mark. The place where the wave broke.

They were already losing their way. They had made a series of bizarrely extravagant signings, agreed to an embarrassing cross-code challenge against Wigan Warriors, in which they got battered 82-6 playing rugby league at Maine Road, and an excruciating six-part behind-the-scenes documentary on the BBC which began with Hall, who had now taken over as director of rugby, promising to “build the most formidable club in Europe”, the “Manchester United and Liverpool of rugby” and ended, a few weeks later, with Hall being told he was being “let go” by his old teammate Swift, who was now the club’s chief executive.

All of which is water under Pulteney Bridge. Bath’s advantage in those years was that Rowell turned them into something like a professional team while everyone else was playing an amateur game. Once other clubs caught up, Bath slipped back into the middle of the league. They have grown-up fans who before this season have only ever known them as underachievers, with a solitary victory in the European Challenge Cup in 2008. You will run out of fingers before you finish listing all the coaches who have had a crack at getting them back where they belonged in the years since.

Over time, you would hear whispers that players had started to see it as a comfy billet, a place where they would be well paid and have a nice life doing it, especially after the owner, Bruce Craig, built them a new training facility on the grounds of Farleigh House.

Whatever else they used to say about Bath back in the day, it never was that they were soft. Johann van Graan has got a lot right since he became their latest director of rugby, not least his recent remarks on the BBC that he felt the club “didn’t understand who they were” when he joined them. The city around it is different too. Ken Loach (who is one of those 1,000 or so Bathonians who prefer Twerton Park)complains it has become too clean, too sharp, too geared towards the day trippers visiting the city for their weekend shopping.

Bath,Loach says, has always been a city of two halves. It is surrounded by farming communities and former coalmining towns, and is rough enough in the bits the tourists don’t go. At their best, the rugby team have always combined both of them. Craig’s money has done a lot of the work, no doubt about it, it paid for Finn Russell, among others. Russell, as a marquee player, is exempt from their salary cap, but to be honest the club’s economics still feel a bit of a mystery. Somehow they have found the money to bring in Santiago Carreras and Henry Arundell next season. But they have a lot of academy players coming up through the squad too, some nicked from elsewhere but a lot of them locals, from Beechen Cliff state school up top of one of the seven hills overlooking the city.

Sign up toThe Breakdown

The latest rugby union news and analysis, plus all the week's action reviewed

after newsletter promotion

Pat Lam is right,the tickets are too expensive. And the Rec is still a ramshackle old place. The club have been arguing with obstinate locals about whether or not they can redevelop it for almost as long as anyone can remember, and will go on arguing about it well into the future. The latest complaint is that their plans could interfere with an old copper beech tree nearby. But the team are winning again; they have an ugly pack, backs worth paying to watch and a handful of local lads in the thick of it. This weekend their supporters will be making the trip to Twickenham for the big match against their old enemy, Leicester. Things change, but this, at least, finally feels like it is staying the same.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian