An impending gas shortfall in eastern Australia? This is just gas market Groundhog Day | Tristan Edis

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"ACCC Warns of Imminent Gas Shortfalls as Federal Government Reviews Market Regulations"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has raised alarms once again about potential gas shortages on the east coast of Australia, prompting the federal government to initiate a review of gas market regulations. This warning is not new; the ACCC has been conducting a gas market inquiry since 2017, consistently highlighting the issue of domestic gas producers prioritizing export markets over local consumers. Despite government approvals for new gas developments, including Santos' Narrabri gas field in 2020, production has not progressed adequately to alleviate the recurring threat of gas shortfalls. Each year, gas producers cite slow government approval processes as the primary issue, yet the cycle of shortages continues, forcing the government to negotiate with producers for additional gas supplies, often resulting in minimal increases that fail to significantly impact prices for consumers.

In response to the ongoing gas supply challenges, the Victorian government proposed a transition from gas appliances to electric alternatives for households, aiming to free up gas supplies for manufacturers. This shift could potentially save households approximately $6.3 billion in energy costs over the next decade, despite the initial expense of new appliances. The proposal, however, faced strong opposition from the oil and gas lobby, which threatened to increase pipeline charges and blamed the Victorian government's policies for the anticipated gas shortages. Critics argue that the gas industry's strategic withholding of production is a significant factor in the supply issues, as producers may intentionally limit output to maintain higher prices. The Victorian government subsequently backed away from its plans to phase out gas heaters, a decision that could have provided substantial benefits to consumers by reducing gas consumption significantly. The ongoing debate highlights the tension between energy policy reform aimed at consumer welfare and the vested interests of gas producers focused on profitability.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is yet againwarning of imminent gas shortfallsfor Australia’s east coast. In response, the federal government hasannounced another reviewinto whether we need to reform our gas market regulation.

Given the ACCC has been running a gas market inquiry since 2017 and has been saying pretty much the same thing every year since – essentially that gas producers treat Australian consumers like second class citizens – isn’t the answer blindingly obvious?

For the past few years, the gas market has been stuck in Groundhog Day. Each year the gas producers tell us that the only problem is slow government approvals for new developments. Interestingly governments have approved many new gas developments, for example Santos’ Narrabri gas field was approved in 2020 but is yet to proceed.

Yet each year we find ourselves in the predicament of imminent shortfalls. Then the government steps in to “negotiate” (or is it beg?) for the gas producers to pretty please provide some extra gas to domestic consumers at a price that won’t cripple them. In response the gas companies miraculously find some extra gas under the couch and dribble out a little bit more, but not too much that it might noticeably reduce prices.

Some gas producers appear to be engaged in a phenomenon so well known to economists they’ve invented a term for it: “strategic withholding”. This is where a producer knows that if they pull back a bit on production then they can force up prices enough that it will increase their overall long-term profits. So, the government can grant permission to exploit extra gas fields, but that doesn’t mean a producer will give us extra gas if it will reduce prices.

The Victorian government proposed that in order to assist manufacturers desperate for gas, it would free up gas supply for them byswitching households away from gas appliancesto electric-powered ones. This would not only assist manufacturers, it would also leave households financially better off.

Independentanalysis by the Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysisfound it would save households $6.3bn on their energy bills over 10 years, compared with an extra cost of new appliances of $3.5bn. Not to mention it would substantially reduce carbon emissions.

The counterattack from the oil and gas lobby was vociferous.

The gas pipeline lobby has been threatening that they’d be massively hiking pipeline charges to make up for the loss of revenue from households. There have been claims that the forthcoming gas shortage was somehow thefaultof the Victorian government for being“anti-gas”. This went to the extent of Santosaccusingthe Victorian government of being akin to that of North Korea. You just had to ignore the fact that gas pipeline flow data clearly shows gas suppliers have beenfunnelling large quantities of Victorian gas northwardfor years. Meanwhile the net gas coming south from Queensland’s gas exporters has been a tiny dribble. You also had to ignore the fact that under this “anti-gas” government, gas producers have been free to pursue new Victorian gas supply investments in recent times involvinghundreds of millions of dollars.

In the face of attacks, the Victorian government pulled back from a phase-out of gas heaters. This would have been the greatest financial and gas supply benefit to consumers of any single energy policy currently in contemplation by Australian governments. Victorian residential gas heating is responsible for about70 petajoules of gas consumption per annumwhich is 20% more gas than currentlyconsumed by all of Victoria’s manufacturing facilitiesand around two to four times the amount ofgas used in power generation in Victoria.

Another way of looking at it is that it would provide around the same amount of extra gas as former federal Liberal leader Peter Dutton had promised under his gas reservation policy. A policy which his colleagues had claimed would“flood” the market with gas.

Yes, a gas heater phase out would have overruled consumer choice. But how many households do you know that when confronted with a broken down heater in winter think through the gas market supply-demand balance over the next decade in deciding what to do? How many pull out a spreadsheet to evaluate the costs and benefits for them to switch over to electric compared to industrial manufacturers?

Those who claim we must leave consumers to choose are the same types of people that gullibly believed oil and gas companies would put the interests of Australian consumers first over making money from LNG export plants.

Tristan Edis is director of analysis and advisory at GreenEnergyMarkets

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian