American investment in soccer will soon face a stern opponent: itself

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"American Investment in European Soccer Creates New Challenges for Major League Soccer"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the realm of sports, American investment in soccer has undergone a significant transformation over the past few decades. The initial skepticism surrounding soccer in the United States, highlighted by former Buffalo Bills quarterback Jack Kemp's dismissive comments about the sport, has given way to a powerful influx of American capital into European soccer. This shift began with billionaire investors acquiring major clubs, often driven by the prospect of increasing the value of these teams through the magic of scarcity. However, a more diverse range of American investors has also emerged, targeting smaller, less glamorous clubs with the potential for growth and profitability. This trend has resulted in a significant American presence in European soccer, with many teams experiencing success on and off the pitch. Notably, a substantial portion of the Premier League's top clubs are now under American ownership, reflecting the strategic investment approach of these investors who see soccer clubs as lucrative assets rather than mere hobbies.

As the landscape of soccer continues to evolve, a new challenge arises for Major League Soccer (MLS) as European leagues increasingly look to tap into the American market. With the recent settlement of a lawsuit allowing for cross-border competition, foreign leagues are poised to capitalize on American fans and their disposable income. This development raises concerns for MLS, which is striving to protect its market share and maintain its relevance amid this growing competition. The league is actively participating in FIFA's working group aimed at regulating foreign leagues' access to American fans. However, the trend of soccer becoming fully Americanized—with a focus on monetization—suggests that the flow of investment and interest from Europe to the United States is unlikely to be curtailed. As American investors have transformed European clubs, the reverse is now occurring, as these clubs set their sights on the lucrative American market, creating a complex and competitive environment for soccer in the U.S.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article examines the evolving landscape of soccer in the United States, particularly in relation to American investment and its competition with European soccer. It reflects on a historical perspective, highlighting the absurdity of past views that equated American football with capitalism and soccer with socialism. This sets the stage for contemporary discussions about the commercialization of soccer and the potential encroachment of European leagues on the American market.

Historical Context and Ideological Shifts

The reference to Jack Kemp's comments from 1986 serves as a stark reminder of how perceptions of soccer in the U.S. have shifted. Kemp's attempt to dismiss soccer as a "socialist" sport contrasts sharply with the current reality, where soccer operates as a highly commercialized entity. The article suggests that past ideologies have not only persisted but have evolved within the context of the growing popularity and financial viability of soccer in America.

Commercialization of Soccer

The piece highlights the ongoing commercialization of soccer, noting the failure of regulatory frameworks like UEFA's financial fair play to rein in the capitalist tendencies of the sport. This is indicative of a broader trend where the lines between domestic and international soccer are blurring, especially with the resolution of legal barriers that previously limited cross-border competition. The implications for Major League Soccer (MLS) are significant, as European leagues may begin to attract American viewers and players, challenging the domestic league’s position.

Investment Dynamics

A critical aspect of the article is the emerging conflict between American investors who have poured money into European soccer and those focusing on the domestic game. This competition could lead to a reassessment of investment strategies as the market dynamics evolve. Investors may face challenges in maintaining profitability in the face of increasing competition from established European clubs, which could affect their long-term strategies and financial outcomes.

Societal and Economic Implications

The potential for European soccer to penetrate the American market raises questions about the future of soccer in the U.S. It could lead to a shift in audience preferences and alter the economic landscape of sports entertainment. The article implies that such changes could have broader societal impacts, potentially redefining American sports culture and influencing the way future generations engage with soccer.

Manipulative Elements and Reliability

While the article presents a strong argument for the commercial evolution of soccer, it may also carry an underlying agenda to promote awareness of the shifting dynamics in sports investments. The language used is provocative, aiming to engage readers by framing the discussion around competition and change. This could be seen as a strategic choice to provoke discussion or influence opinions regarding soccer's future in America.

The reliability of the information presented seems solid, given the historical references and current market assessments. However, the framing of the narrative may lean towards sensationalism to capture attention, which is a common trait in sports journalism.

The article resonates with audiences interested in sports economics, investment strategies, and cultural shifts in American society. It effectively targets those who are invested in the future of soccer, whether as fans, investors, or stakeholders in the sports industry.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In 1986, the former Buffalo Bills quarterback and future Republican vice-presidential nominee Jack Kemp spoke on the floor of the US House of Representatives and said a silly thing. “Football,” he said, referring to the gridiron variety, “is democratic capitalism, whereas soccer is a European socialist sport.”

Kemp was trying, apparently, to underpin his opposition to the US potentially hosting the 1994 Fifa World Cup. Later on, by which time his comments had been tucked away into the filing cabinet of infamy, he contended that he was only kidding. Kemp attended said World Cup himself and admitted that half his grandchildren were soccer players. Sure. Fine.

What makes the quote memorable nearly four decades later is how ludicrous it was, and very much still is, on its face. The NFL, after all, remains a closed and heavily socialized economy, whereas soccer’s runaway capitalism zooms along largely unfettered. Soccer, as a business, metastasizes in spite of failed or failing attempts to stand up fiscal guardrails like Uefa’s “financial fair play” regulations or the Premier League’s “profit and sustainability rules.”

Soccer’s final barriers to total commercialization and highest-bidder-ism are crumbling. Competitions like the Premier League, La Liga, Serie A and Liga MX are evidently free to undertake these incursions into the territorial sovereignty of Major League Soccer now thata lawsuit by a promoter has been settled, removing the last obstacle blocking cross-border domestic competition. A Fifa working group is now outlining rules for this newly borderless landscape, but these away-away games in the United States staged by other leagues are pretty much an inevitability.

This sets up a kind of reckoning between the two occasionally-overlapping sects of the American investor class: Those that bought into European soccer, and those that did so with the interests of the domestic game.

If European club soccer tries to eat into the American market, that will be, at least in some part, because American capital devoured much of the sport on the old continent and then transformed it.

For several decades now, American investors have systematically bought European clubs, or bits of them. First came the billionaires, buying the mega-clubs, following in the wretched wake of the Glazer family’s highly leveraged and resource-draining acquisition of Manchester United in a hostile takeover. Then, more quietly, a less moneyed class of American investor without the means to buy a multi-billion team in the NFL, MLB or NBA, or much interest in the nine-figure valuations of MLS teams, scooped uplots of sensibly low-cost, high-upside European clubswith less fashionable names.

These investors were in it for varying reasons and deployed varying approaches. The billionaires made the same old billionaires’ gambit, banking on the years-long constant of widely supported sports teams becoming worth ever more money through the magic of scarcity. All they really had to do was ensure that they expended just enough effort and cash to safeguard that support. Other owners just liked the idea of owning a team in some city or country they enjoyed going to – a lifestyle choice that one soccer economistcalled“A very expensive season ticket.” And some others were in it for the content – call them the Wrexham Ownership Division.

And then there was the sort of investor who saw a club that would benefit from an injection of savvy. An institution that could be run more professionally and profitably, perhaps promoted once or twice, or qualified for a European competition, operated more shrewdly in the tantalizingly all-cash transfer market. This was the approach in the bulk of those American acquisitions of European teams, and there were dozens of them, often folded into small constellations of clubs across the continent. For a long time, there were plenty such clubs up for sale, or looking for investment. Around the time Brett Johnson and his group were in the market for a club and bought Ipswich Town – for either $24m or $55m, depending on the report – he was,he said, approached about buying scores of clubs, a different one every week. Armed with historically cheap debt, American investors feasted on soccer clubs doubling as distressed assets in the wake of a ruinous pandemic.

Some of those investments wentcatastrophicallywrongbut at the more visible end of the European club football business, American ownerships have had ahugely successful season. Three of the Premier League’s current top-five clubs are American owned, as are six of the top 10. Crystal Palace, meanwhile, is 12th and Manchester United is, well, where Manchester United is. Ipswich will be relegated, but only after it was promoted in back-to-back campaigns under Johnson’s ownership. Both automatically-promoted Championship teams have American owners. In the third-tier League one, promoted Wrexham is wholly American-owned and Birmingham City part-owned by Americans. In Serie A, four of the top-9 have American owners and a fifth is controlled by a Canadian. In France, two of the top-5 are under American control.

Sign up toSoccer with Jonathan Wilson

Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer

after newsletter promotion

Many of those American owners of European teams must have decided against putting their money into MLS instead. And when you consider that Real Salt Lake, coupled with the NWSL’s Utah Royals, recently sold fora reported $600m, it isn’t hard to unravel the math that got done. Recall, after all, that the Saudi takeover of historic Premier League mainstay Newcastle United (and its vast fanbase) in 2021 was valued at £300m ($400m).

Now that the rest of the soccer world has been fully liberated to treat the United States as anATM to be plundered at regular intervals, those investment choices could have far-reaching repercussions for the domestic game. MLS’s interests are represented in the Fifa working group, and the league has been pushing to curtail foreign leagues’ access to its market – and its fans and their disposable income – to the American off-season, or at least the fallow periods in its calendar, per The Athletic. The working group as a whole hopes to curb how many games can be moved abroad.

Yet there may be no stopping the border-hopping. Because soccer is fully Americanized in that it is now almost universally arranged to optimize monetization. The Americans came for the European soccer clubs, and now those teams, and all the others around them, are stealing covetous glances back at America.

If only Jack Kemp were alive to see it.

Leander Schaerlaeckens is at work on a book about the United States men’s national soccer team, out in 2026. He teaches at Marist University.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian