Advance director says ‘bed-wetting anonymous Liberals’ trying to blame others after bitter election defeat

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Internal Liberal Party Disputes Over Role of Advance Australia Following Election Loss"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the aftermath of a disappointing election result for the Liberal Party, internal conflict has erupted regarding the role of the right-wing advocacy group Advance Australia. Several senior Liberal sources have openly criticized Advance, suggesting that its involvement had either no positive impact or even detracted from the party's performance. Matthew Sheahan, Advance's executive director, countered these claims by accusing certain Liberal members of seeking scapegoats for their electoral failures, labeling them as 'bed-wetting anonymous Liberals.' He emphasized that Advance's mission is not solely to support the Liberal Party but to advocate for broader issues concerning Australia’s freedom and prosperity. Despite Advance’s claims of a successful campaign that supposedly harmed the Greens, critics argue that the resulting Liberal losses were primarily due to Labor's strategic gains in key constituencies, with Liberal preferences playing a pivotal role.

Moreover, the criticism extends to the nature of Advance's campaign tactics, which some Liberal insiders describe as extreme and counterproductive. A source within the NSW Liberal party expressed concerns that Advance’s advertising alienated undecided voters and muddled the party's messaging, particularly in electorates where independent candidates were competitive. This confusion reportedly led to invalid votes as voters mistakenly equated Greens and teal candidates on their ballots. Sheahan dismissed these criticisms, asserting that Advance was not responsible for the outcomes in particular seats, such as Bradfield, where an independent candidate recently took a narrow lead against a Liberal rival. The ongoing blame game within the party highlights a deeper struggle to address the root causes of their electoral decline, with some members suggesting that the party must reevaluate its strategies and affiliations to regain voter trust and support in future elections.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a contentious narrative surrounding the recent election defeat experienced by the Liberal Party in Australia and the role of the right-wing advocacy group, Advance Australia. It highlights the internal conflicts within the party and the blame game that ensued following the election outcome, with key figures from the party pointing fingers at Advance for its perceived ineffectiveness and detrimental impact on the Liberal campaign.

Internal Blame Game

The piece illustrates the struggle within the Liberal Party to assign blame for the election results. Matthew Sheahan, the executive director of Advance, dismisses criticisms from within the party, labeling dissenters as “bed-wetting anonymous Liberals” who are deflecting responsibility. This reflects a deep-seated frustration and a defensive posture from Advance, suggesting that the organization believes it has been unfairly targeted by party insiders seeking scapegoats for their losses.

Impact of Advance Australia

While Advance claims success in its campaign efforts, pointing to a reduction in the Greens' primary votes, insiders argue that its focus on attacking the Greens ultimately benefited the Labor Party by consolidating votes for teal independents. This contradiction raises questions about the effectiveness of Advance's strategies, suggesting that while it may have harmed one opponent, it inadvertently aided another, thereby complicating the narrative of its success.

Voter Confusion and Messaging

Critics within the Liberal Party express concerns that Advance’s campaigning tactics alienated undecided voters, branding its materials as “extreme.” This feedback points to a potential misalignment between the party's messaging and the broader electorate's preferences, indicating that Advance's approach may have confused voters and diluted the Liberal message, which is critical in competitive electoral districts.

Manipulative Elements

The article could be perceived as having a manipulative edge, particularly in its language and framing. By using terms like "bed-wetting" to describe dissenting party members, it sets a derogatory tone that may distract from the substantive criticisms being made. This choice of language could be interpreted as an attempt to delegitimize opposing views within the party, thereby consolidating support for Advance’s narrative.

Public Perception and Future Scenarios

The public discourse following this article could influence perceptions of internal party dynamics, potentially leading to a further fracturing of support among Liberal voters. This internal conflict may also affect the broader political landscape, as it signals a party grappling with its identity and strategic direction in the face of electoral challenges.

Community Support Dynamics

Supporters of the article seem to come from factions within the right-leaning spectrum of Australian politics, particularly those aligned with the Liberal Party and its base. The article’s framing and the responses it generates may resonate more with individuals who are critical of the Greens and Labor, rather than undecided or centrist voters.

Market Impact

While the article primarily focuses on political issues, its implications could extend to market sentiments, particularly around companies or sectors closely tied to political outcomes. However, any immediate effects on stock markets or specific shares would likely depend on broader economic indicators rather than the internal disputes of a political party.

This analysis indicates that the article serves to project a narrative of conflict and blame within the Liberal Party while attempting to position Advance Australia as a critical player in shaping electoral outcomes. The tone and language used suggest an intent to rally support for Advance’s approach while discrediting internal critics, reflecting a broader struggle for influence within the party.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Several senior Liberal sources have questioned the impact of Advance Australia, with some arguing the rightwing advocacy group made “no difference at all” to the election result and others warning it “undermined” the party and cost it votes.

The criticism has sparked a bitter blame game, with Advance’s executive director, Matthew Sheahan, accusing “bed-wetting anonymous Liberals” of “looking to blame everyone but themselves”, and adding that Advance “does not exist to get hopeless Liberals elected”.

Advance claimed its federal election campaign – bankrolled by $15.6m in donations during the 2023-24 financial year – to be a “success” that “destroyed the Greens” and led to “terminal declines in their primary votes”.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

But one senior Liberal MP said that while Advance may have damaged the Greens, this ultimately benefited Labor, whichwon the seats of Melbourne, Brisbane and Griffith. They said Liberal preferences ultimately determined this outcome, not Advance.

A NSW Liberal party source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, accused Advance’s campaign material of alienating some undecided voters in target seats. They described the groups’s campaign material as “extreme”.“It plays to the Liberal base or to voters further to the right of the Liberals, but it can distract and undermine our own messaging,” said the Liberal source. “I wouldn’t say on balance that it aided the Liberal campaign.”

Another senior Liberal source said Advance inadvertently “undermined the Liberal campaign” in seats held by teal incumbents.

“Their advertising focused on attacking the Greens, but all that did was drive up the teal vote,” said the senior source, who also declined to be named so they could speak freely.

“Their messaging also confused voters and led people to put the teals and Greens equal last which meant Liberal votes could not be counted [as the ballot was invalid]. Their poor judgment in their campaign strategy might be the difference between winning Bradfield, or not.”

Late on Monday, the independent candidate for Bradfield, Nicolette Boele,overtook her Liberal rival, Gisele Kapterian, with a narrow lead of 40 votes.

Sheahan said Advance did not distribute material in Bradfield and did not campaign in Goldstein or Kooyong. He said the outcome in those three seats had nothing to do with Advance and that suggestions otherwise were “just wrong”.

“The Liberal party would do better to focus on how they managed to lose 11 seats to Labor rather than on the three seats Labor took from the Greens,” Sheahan said.

“All of this shows that many Liberals have learned absolutely nothing from their worst ever defeat. Fresh out of a shocking campaign, they are looking to blame everyone but themselves.”

In Victoria, Advance wasbankrolled by a $500,000 donationfrom the state branch’s nominated entity, the Cormack Foundation. The foundation also allocated $1m to the Liberals in the same year.

While one Liberal MP said Advance made “honestly no difference at all” to the election result, a former MP said the party would ultimately realise the group was not a sustainable campaign affiliate. They cited the group’s embrace of “populist” culture war issues, suggesting they only appealed to a small subsection of voters.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

“They are taking a lot of money from a lot of people who are being hoodwinked,” they said. “They are not spending it [effectively], and what they spend it on is high-profile, low-impact campaigns that splinter our electoral coalition.”

“While it may be difficult to get that through to Liberal party members and supporters because of theSky After Dark effect, ultimately, the truth wins out.”

In response, Sheahan said he wasn’t surprised some Liberal voters had adopted Advance’s campaign material, claiming “their own campaign didn’t have any”.

“No one should be surprised that bed-wetting anonymous Liberals are backgrounding against Advance and don’t have the guts to stand by their comments publicly, I wouldn’t put my name to their campaign either,” he said.

“The truth is that Advance does not exist to get hopeless Liberals elected, it instead campaigns to promote and defend Australia’s freedom, security and prosperity.”

Advance claims to have delivered “millions” of broadcast ads and flyers during the campaign and splashed its messages on billboards, bus shelters and trucks.Analysis of public dataindicated the group spent $1.7m on social media ads with $239,300 targeted at key seats.

The group paid to promote the slogan “weak woke and sending us broke: Anthony Albanese has got to go”. It also campaigned for an end to public funding for welcome to country ceremonies before Peter Dutton’spublic comments on the issue– which were criticised by former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull as “pure culture-war stuff” that “turns a lot of people off”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian