Adoption charity says cuts mean more children at risk of returning to care in England

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Charities Warn of Increased Risk for Adopted Children Due to Funding Cuts in England"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Charities have raised alarms over the increasing risk of adopted children returning to the care system in England due to significant funding cuts and a lack of adequate support for families. Adoption UK has reported a concerning rise in calls from families in crisis, with many expressing fears for their children's wellbeing. Alison Woodhead, the charity's director of public affairs and communications, emphasized that the situation is unprecedented in her decade-long experience in adoption. Families are facing extreme pressures, with some parents reporting fears that their children may resort to suicide. The charity highlighted that without proper support, families are at risk of breaking apart, which could lead to children being placed back into the care system, a situation that is both morally and economically unsustainable. The government’s recent decision to cut the adoption and special guardianship support fund by 40% has been described as a devastating blow to families and children who rely on these resources for therapy and assistance.

The consequences of these funding cuts are already being felt, with Adoption UK's annual adoption barometer indicating that 38% of adoptive families are confronting severe challenges or are nearing crisis. This marks a significant increase from the previous year. The number of children leaving their adoptive families prematurely has also risen, from 3% in 2021 to 7% in 2023. Legal experts are noting a surge in families seeking advice on returning children to local authorities, indicating a dire need for support that is not being met. Many parents feel they have exhausted all options and are facing traumatic decisions as a last resort. Meanwhile, the Department for Education has pledged to sustain the support fund for another year, allowing for continued access to therapy for adopted children. However, the broader concerns about the adequacy of support and the future of adoption in England remain critical issues that need to be addressed urgently to prevent further crises among adoptive families.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights significant concerns regarding the welfare of adopted children in England, emphasizing the ramifications of funding cuts on their well-being and the stability of adoptive families. The statements from adoption charities present a dire scenario where a lack of support could lead to an increased risk of children returning to the care system.

Funding Cuts and Their Impact

The article reveals that a 40% cut in funding for adoption support is causing distress among families, leading to fears about children's mental health and overall stability. The assertion that many families are on the verge of crisis underscores the urgency of the situation. This funding is portrayed as crucial, not just for immediate support but as a preventative measure against future costs associated with failing to provide necessary services.

Moral and Economic Arguments

Alison Woodhead's comments frame the funding cuts as both morally indefensible and economically imprudent. The argument suggests that investing in support for adopted children now could save more significant expenses later, as neglecting their needs could lead to higher rates of criminal activity, educational failures, and mental health issues. This dual perspective aims to challenge policymakers by appealing to both ethical considerations and fiscal responsibility.

Decline in Adoption Rates

The mention of a nearly 60% decrease in families approved to adopt in the past decade introduces another layer of concern. It implies that if the current trend of cuts continues, it may further discourage potential adoptive parents, exacerbating the crisis in the adoption system. This decline highlights systemic issues within the adoption framework that may need addressing.

Community Response and Public Sentiment

The article seems to be geared toward mobilizing public sentiment against governmental funding cuts. By sharing personal stories of families struggling, it aims to foster empathy and spark outrage, potentially pressuring the government to reconsider its budgetary decisions. This strategy aligns with the broader goal of advocacy groups to rally community support for vulnerable populations.

Trustworthiness of the Article

The article appears credible, primarily because it cites specific statistics, quotes from officials within adoption charities, and provides a clear context of the issues at hand. However, the emotional weight and dramatic language used may indicate an intention to provoke a strong reaction, which could be seen as manipulative.

Overall, the piece promotes awareness of a critical social issue while advocating for a change in policy to protect adopted children and families. It is likely to resonate with communities invested in child welfare and social justice, potentially leading to increased advocacy efforts.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A growing number of adopted children are at risk of returning to the care system as funding cuts and lack of support pushes England’s families into crisis, charities have warned.

Adoption UK said cuts to funding were already having a “devastating” effect on children who have been adopted, describing them as “morally and economically nonsensical”.

“We’ve had hundreds and hundreds of families call our helpline or come along to events to express their concerns. I’ve worked in adoption now for nearly 10 years, I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Alison Woodhead, the director of public affairs and communications at the charity.

“People have been saying they’re worried their children will commit suicide – families are at breaking point, and without support they’re worried that the family might not be able to stay together, that children will end up back in the care system.”

In April, the government announceda 40% cut in the amount availablefor each child from the annual £50m adoption and special guardianship support fund – money sent to local authorities and regional adoption agencies to provide therapy for adopted children.

Woodhead said it was a “crucial pot of money that has been transformational in lots of children’s lives” and the cuts would have a huge impact.

“It is both morally and economically nonsensical because these children who desperately need the support will cost more further down the track if they don’t get it,” Woodhead said.

“Adopted children are already massively overrepresented in criminal justice statistics, in not in education, employment or training statistics, do worse in school than their peers. It’s just setting the children up to fail further and symbolic of a general sense that adopted children are being let down.”

She also said the cuts could worsen the decline in adoptive parents in the country–from 2013 to 2023, the number of families approved to adopt in England decreased by almost 60%.

“The government is spending quite a lot of money on a recruitment campaign to try to get prospective adopters. But if the bigger picture is that you adopt a child, you don’t get support, and then your child ends up back in the care system, that’s not a very enticing prospect. So they’re also shooting themselves in the foot.”

The charity’s annual adoption barometer showed 38% of adoptive families were facing severe challenges or reaching crisis point in 2023, a rise from 22% in 2022.

The number of children who left their family prematurely (for example, to return to the care system or to live in assisted accommodation) was 7% that year, up from 3% in 2021, and the charity is expecting numbers to rise.

Tracy Beaumont, from Ridley & Hall solicitors’ adoption legal centre, said they were being inundated by calls from families across the country in “absolute crisis”, and seeking legal advice on returning their child to the care of their local authority.

“Many of the parents, unfortunately, they’ve tried everything. They’ve tried to get the support and the help, they’ve done absolutely everything, and they’re just at a point of crisis as a family,” she said.

She advises people on how to apply, through section 20 of theChildrenAct 1989, for the local authority to accommodate a child in need, a process which she says is “extremely traumatic” for those involved and a “last resort”. It can then lead to court proceedings for a care order.

“A lot of my clients think that it could have been prevented but obviously local authorities have limited resources anyway, and then the government have just cut the adoption support fund. They need the right support at the right time,” she said. “The parents are really traumatised by the whole experience, and then the poor children at the heart of this end up back in care.”

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “We know how important this support is to families – and through our plan for change, we’re committed to ensuring adopted and kinship families continue to receive the help they need to thrive.

“We are investing £50m for the adoption and special guardianship support fund to continue for another year with children still being able to access £3,000 in therapy support each year.

“The decisions we have taken will ensure the fund is financially sustainable to allow more vulnerable children to access targeted support.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian