Academic with apparent ties to Beijing has forged links within UK parliament

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Academic Yu Xiong's Connections to Chinese Organizations Raise Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Yu Xiong, a professor at the University of Surrey and a cryptocurrency entrepreneur, has established connections within the UK parliament, raising concerns due to his apparent ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Since 2022, Xiong has participated in numerous events in the House of Lords, interacting with key figures such as Baroness Uddin. He previously led the UK branch of the Western Returned Scholars Association (WRSA), an organization linked to the United Front Work Department, which aims to promote China's interests globally. Security agencies in the UK and other Western nations have warned about the United Front's influence operations, describing them as deceptive and well-funded. Despite his connections, Xiong denies any links to the United Front or extensive ties to the CCP, asserting that his involvement in various associations is part of his academic role aimed at fostering international cooperation for the benefit of Surrey University.

Xiong's activities have included meetings with Chinese officials regarding a controversial mega-embassy project in Tower Hamlets, which has faced local opposition but is now being reconsidered by UK ministers. He has also met King Charles and attended several events related to digital technology, positioning himself as an adviser to the all-party parliamentary group on the metaverse. Experts have expressed concern that his role as UK president of the WRSA suggests significant integration into the CCP's influence network. Xiong has been vocal in supporting Beijing's foreign policy, particularly regarding Taiwan, which has further fueled scrutiny of his activities. His interactions with UK parliamentarians and participation in high-profile events have raised questions about the extent of foreign influence in British politics, prompting calls for greater transparency regarding foreign connections within the UK government. Meanwhile, Baroness Uddin has stated that she was unaware of Xiong's previous role with the WRSA, emphasizing that their interactions were proper and focused on collaboration.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the connections between an academic, Yu Xiong, and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), raising significant concerns about foreign influence in the UK Parliament. The narrative focuses on his ties to the United Front Work Department and his interactions within British governmental structures, which could suggest a potential for foreign interference in UK affairs.

Intended Purpose of the Report

The primary aim of the article appears to be to inform the public about potential foreign influence in the UK Parliament through individuals connected to the CCP. It seeks to raise awareness about the implications of these ties, particularly in light of heightened security concerns regarding espionage and influence operations from foreign entities, especially China. By highlighting Xiong's connections, the article aims to provoke scrutiny of foreign engagement in UK politics.

Public Perception and Narrative Creation

This news piece is likely to create a perception of unease regarding Chinese influence in the UK, particularly among those who may already harbor suspicions about foreign interference in domestic affairs. It suggests that individuals with connections to the CCP can gain access to high levels of government, which could fuel public fear and xenophobia. The language used, alongside the context of national security, aims to invoke a sense of urgency and caution among the populace.

Potential Hidden Agendas

While the article primarily focuses on Xiong's activities, it might also serve to divert attention from other pressing issues in UK politics or society. By centering on foreign influence, the narrative could overshadow domestic policies or failures, focusing public discourse on external threats rather than internal challenges.

Manipulative Elements and Trustworthiness

The article exhibits a medium to high level of manipulativeness, primarily through its framing of Xiong and the implications of his associations without deeply exploring the nuances of his denials and the complexities of international academic collaboration. While the facts presented may be accurate, the selective emphasis on certain aspects of Xiong's background can skew public perception. Hence, the reliability of the article can be considered moderate, as it presents factual information but may lack balance and context.

Societal and Economic Impact

The implications of this news could provoke increased scrutiny of Chinese investments and collaborations within the UK. This could lead to more restrictive policies on foreign funding in academia and business, potentially stifling beneficial collaborations. The political climate may become more polarized, with calls for stricter regulations on foreign influence leading to debates over academic freedom and international partnerships.

Audience and Community Response

This report is likely to resonate more with nationalistic and security-focused communities who are concerned about foreign interference. It may appeal to those advocating for greater transparency and accountability in government dealings with foreign entities.

Market Impact and Global Dynamics

In terms of stock markets, companies with ties to China or that rely on Chinese investments may experience fluctuations based on public sentiment and government regulations stemming from the article's implications. The geopolitical context suggests that such narratives can influence market perceptions, particularly in sectors sensitive to foreign relations, such as technology and finance.

Relevance to Current Global Affairs

This article connects to ongoing global discussions about national security and foreign influence in democratic institutions. The concerns raised are not new but are part of a broader trend of increased scrutiny of foreign ties in Western democracies, particularly regarding China.

AI Influence in the Article

While it's possible that AI tools were employed in drafting or editing the article, the specific elements of tone and narrative direction are difficult to attribute without further context. The framing of the narrative could suggest a deliberate choice to emphasize foreign threat over collaboration, which could be seen as a form of influence, whether human or AI-driven.

In conclusion, the article presents a complex narrative that raises important questions about foreign influence while also reflecting broader societal anxieties. Its trustworthiness hinges on the balance of information provided versus the potential for bias in framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

An academic with apparent connections to the Chinese Communist party has forged links inside the UK parliament and met King Charles andQueen Camilla.

Yu Xiong, a professor of business analytics at the University of Surrey and a cryptocurrency entrepreneur, has attended a dozen events in the House of Lords since 2022 and had regular contact with peers including Baroness Uddin, a cross-bencher.

Xiong appears to be connected to the Chinese Communist party (CCP), having until May 2023 led a branch of the Western Returned Scholars Association (WRSA),which states that it is “managed by”the United Front Work Department. He was president of the UK branch of the WRSA, representing Chongqing, China’s largest city.

Described by the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, as his party’s “magic weapon”, the United Front exists to advance China’s aims abroad. Under party regulations, its principles include “upholding the leadership of the CCP” and opposing Taiwanese independence.

Security agencies in the UK, US and other western countries have issued public warnings about the United Front’s activities. Ken McCallum, the director general of MI5, said in 2022 that the United Front was mounting “patient, well-funded, deceptive campaigns to buy and exert influence”.

Xiong has also attended at least three meetings in 2023 and 2024 with Chinese officials to discuss advancing their controversial plans for a new mega-embassy in Tower Hamlets. The plans were originally blocked by the local council but are being reconsidered by ministers after China resubmitted its application last year.

His apparent connections to the Chinese government are likely to come under scrutiny as ministers in the UK target parts of the Chinese state under new foreign influence rules.

Xiong denies that he is linked to the United Front and strongly rejects that he has extensive connections to the CCP. He said he had not attended any meetings of the WRSA since 2019, and that he had allowed his role as UK president to lapse in 2023.

Xiong said the WRSA obtains its relevant permissions from the United Front, along with many other associations with hundreds of millions of members between them. Through his solicitors, Xiong stated that it is “absurd”, “grossly unfair”, and “overly simplistic” to identify him as someone with links to the United Front and said that it was disingenuous and racist to connect him with the CCP.

“In my role as an associate vice-president and academic, I am required to network with political figures in the UK and stakeholders across the globe in order to advance international cooperation in my field for the benefit of Surrey University. There is nothing unusual about my membership of various Chinese academic/trade associations.”

Uddin said she had not been aware of Xiong’s role with the WRSA before she was contacted by the Guardian, but stressed that there was nothing improper about their friendship. The pair collaborated on an all-party parliamentary group (APPG) and attended meetings together in London, China and Bangladesh, including one with the Chinese ambassador to Dhaka.

Experts said that Xiong’s role as UK president suggested “a high level of integration into the CCP-led United Front system” and “should trigger further scrutiny of the WRSA’s activities in the UK”.

Alex Joske, a director at the Australian consultancy McGrathNicol who is an expert on the WRSA, said the United Front “plays a fundamental role in expanding the CCP’s political influence internationally, and it has sought to mobilise its international contacts in support of Chinese government interests. Prof Xiong’s connections into UK politics should trigger further scrutiny of the WRSA’s activities in the UK.”

Xiong has established connections inside parliament and briefly met the king and queen. In June 2023, Xiong posted on LinkedIn that he had met King Charles while attending a charity ball at St James Palace, saying the men “discussed AI and technologies that will change the world”. In October that year, he posted that he had a “private meeting” with Paul Scully, then technology minister, through his role at Surrey University.

Since 2022, Xiong has attended at least a dozen events in the House of Lords on digital technology and interacted with Uddin and Lord Taylor of Warwick, cross-bench peers who were formerly affiliated with Labour and the Conservatives respectively. Xiong said there was nothing improper about his interactions with politicians, businesspeople and members of the royal family.

Xiong addressed several of the events he attended in parliament in his capacity as an adviser to theall-party parliamentary group on the metaverse and web 3.0, which was co-chaired by Uddin until parliament was dissolved in May 2024 for the election.

The APPG’s secretariat was run by the UK International Innovation Centre (UKIIC), a company that listed Xiong among its directors until April 2024. The UKIIC, whose website was taken down for several months after the Guardian’s inquiries, stated its aims as “upgrading China’s soft power and international influence”. Xiong said he was not aware this phrase had appeared on the website and he did not share that aim.

At the same time as forging connections in British politics and academia, Xiong has been an outspoken supporter of Beijing’s foreign policy aims, including its claim over Taiwan. In 2023, Xiong was quoted in a Chinese state media article about a meeting between Xi and the Central Committee of the Communist Youth League. According to the report, he said: “As new immigrants in the UK, we will leverage the unique advantages of Chinese people overseas in promoting the complete reunification of the motherland” – a reference to China’s claim over self-governing Taiwan.

Sign up toFirst Edition

Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Xiong’s solicitors in response said that he “considers that any peaceful resolution of the issues between China and Taiwan is better than a non-peaceful one”. They said: “Our client is not a politician, and his views about reintegration of Taiwan into China are informed only by his desire to see a peaceful outcome.

“His comments were made shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which caused many people to consider how other territorial disputes could best be resolved peacefully. None of our client’s views on this subject should be taken to mean that he does not respect the Taiwanese people’s right to self-determination, which is absolute.”

In 2019, he was pictured in the VIP section of the celebrations for the 70th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China on Tiananmen Square in Beijing. He was invited to attend by the Organisation Department, one of the most important organs of the CCP, which oversees staffing in the party. Through his lawyers, Xiong rejected the suggestion that his attendance at the celebrations on Tiananmen Square represented a relationship with the CCP or the United Front.

In December 2023 and February and March 2024, Xiong attended meetings with Chinese officials, which were held to discuss ways of progressing proposals to build a super-embassy at Royal Mint Court, according to evidence seen by the Guardian. Present at all three meetings was Xia Yuzi, the Chinese embassy official responsible for the planning application.

The Guardian has seen a business proposal addressed to Xiong by a third party after one of the meetings offering to advise the Chinese embassy on the matter. Dated March 2023, the proposal said it was “a pleasure to sit down with the key people in the proposed project of the Chinese embassy at Royal Mint Court”, adding: “We would be happy to help you on an advisory basis.”

Xiong accepted that he received the proposal but said it was unsolicited. After being told there were text messages showing he asked for costs and timeframes, Xiong said that he offered to review the proposal as a way of rejecting it and that he never passed it on to the Chinese embassy. He strongly denied acting as an interlocutor between the embassy and other parties.

Uddin, a former Labour councillor in Tower Hamlets, was present at two of the meetings with Chinese embassy officials. The peer said she did not know the purpose of the meetings she attended and did not discuss the embassy plans. Messages seen by the Guardian suggest that in late 2023, she sought to arrange a meeting with Xiong and an intermediary to discuss the Chinese embassy. Uddin said this might have been about the embassy’s community impact.

Over the last two years, Xiong and Uddin spent time together abroad in Bangladesh and China. In February 2024, they met Yao Wen, China’s ambassador in Dhaka, and in April they attended a conference in Chongqing aimed at fostering UK-China cooperation.

Separately, draft marketing materials seen by the Guardian list both Taylor and Uddin as advisers to the “Thames Fund”, an investment fund by a crypto company named JKL Capital, where Xiong is a director.

Taylor declared he was a paid consultant to JKL Capital between November 2023 and December 2024, when he removed the entry from his register of interests after the Guardian started making inquiries. He said the entry had been made in error.

Both Uddin and Taylor said that they had never heard of the Thames Fund and were unaware they had been pictured on its marketing materials. Xiong said the document was a draft which had only been circulated internally, and that the Thames Fund did not exist yet. He said no one had been paid by JKL Capital in the UK.

Additional research by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian