Abortions in the US are on the rise three years after Roe v Wade was overturned

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Increase in Abortions Reported in the U.S. Three Years After Roe v. Wade Overturn"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Three years after the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the number of abortions in the United States has seen a significant increase, with providers performing 1.14 million abortions in 2024. This figure represents the highest recorded number in recent years, according to data from #WeCount, a project by the Society of Family Planning that has been tracking abortion provision since 2022. Notably, this rise in abortions has occurred even in states that have implemented strict bans on the procedure. Ushma Upadhyay, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco, expressed surprise at the upward trend, indicating that while abortion bans have not eliminated the need for abortion services, they have made access more challenging for individuals seeking care. The growing reliance on telehealth for abortions has also contributed to this increase, with telehealth abortions rising from 19% of total abortions in December 2023 to 25% in December 2024. This method has proven particularly beneficial for patients in states with limited access to in-clinic abortion services, such as Montana, Nevada, and Hawaii.

The increase in telehealth abortions is largely attributed to the establishment of 'shield laws,' which protect providers in states with abortion bans from legal repercussions when treating patients from those states. Since the introduction of these laws in 2023, demand has surged, with shield-law abortion providers facilitating nearly 14,000 abortions by December 2024, up from fewer than 6,000 in July 2023. Despite these developments, states with total abortion bans reported an average of only 30 in-person abortions per month, highlighting the inadequacy of exceptions for emergency situations as many women have reported being denied necessary care. The future of shield laws is uncertain, as legal challenges are emerging. Additionally, access to mifepristone, a key medication used in telehealth abortions, is under scrutiny, with calls for a review of its safety and usage. Nevertheless, advocates like Dr. Angel Foster remain optimistic about the continued demand for abortion services, despite the challenges posed by legislative restrictions and legal battles.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Three years after theUS supreme courtoverturned Roe v Wade, erasing the national right to abortion and paving the way for more than a dozen states to ban the procedure, the number of abortions performed in the US is still on the rise – including in some statesthat ban the procedure.

US abortion providers performed 1.14m abortions in 2024, according to new data released Monday by #WeCount, a Society of Family Planning project that has tracked abortion provision since 2022. That’s the highest number on record in recent years.

“We were really surprised to see the numbers go up over time,” said Ushma Upadhyay, a University of California, San Francisco professor who serves as co-chair of the #WeCount steering committee. “Abortion bans haven’t really stopped people from needing abortion care. It’s just made it harder for them to be able to get them.”

Although most of the abortions documented in #WeCount’s report took place in person, a growing number of abortions are occurring through telehealth, including among patients living in one of the dozen-plus statesthat ban virtually all abortions.In a telehealth abortion, patients generally meet virtually with a provider before receiving abortion pills through the mail. By December 2023, 19% of abortions took place through telehealth – but by December 2024, that share had risen to 25%.

In the last three months of 2024 alone, more than 70,000 abortions were performed through telehealth. These abortions are particularly popular in states with large rural regions, such as Montana, Nevada and Hawaii.

Much of the increase in telehealth abortions can be attributed to the spread of“shield laws”. Enacted by at least eight states since Roe’s fall, these controversial laws are designed to protect abortion providers who treat women in states with bans from prosecution by those states.

Demand for shield-law abortions has skyrocketed over the last two years. In July 2023, when the first shield-law abortion providers started operating, they facilitated fewer than 6,000 abortions for people living in states that ban almost all abortions or that restrict telehealth abortions. In December 2024, these providers performed almost 14,000 abortions.

“There’s more abortion taking place in Mississippi today than there was prior to Dobbs,” said Dr Angel Foster, a co-founder of the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project (Map), which uses shield laws to ship abortion pills out to about 2,500 patients per month. “That really speaks to how little access some folks had to in-clinic abortion care prior to Dobbs and how shield law provision and telemedicine has really stepped into that space.”

WeCount also collected information on how many abortions were reported to government authorities in states with abortion bans in 2024. On average, states where abortion is totally banned saw just 30 in-person abortions per month, #WeCount found.

All abortion bans permit abortions in emergency situations, but activists have long contended that that bans’ exceptions are written so narrowly and vaguely that they are unworkable in practice. Since Roe fell,dozens of women have come forwardto say they weredenied emergency abortions.

In Upadhyay’s view, the #WeCount data backs up the claim that exceptions don’t work.

“That seems very low,” Upadhyay said. “That is something that I think states with abortion bans should be paying attention to and be concerned about.”

The future of shield laws is now in doubt, as anti-abortion activists are trying to test theirdurability in court. Texas has sued a New York doctor over accusations that she mailed abortion pills to a woman in Texas, while Louisiana has indicted the same doctor for allegedly mailing a pill to that state.

Access to the common abortion drug mifepristone is also under assault. Martin Makary, the FDA commissioner, and Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, have called for a “review” of mifepristone, which is typically used in telehealth abortions – and which has beendeemed safeby more than 100 studies conducted across dozens of countries. Kennedy specifically citedthe results of aflawed analysis pushed by anti-abortion groupsthat claimedthe complication rates from taking mifepristone are higher than previously known.

“Clearly, it indicates that, at very least, the label should be changed,” Kennedy told the Missouri senator Josh Hawley, a Republican, during a congressional hearing.

For now, however, Foster remains optimistic about the future of her work.

“There will be a point where growth stops. There’s a finite number of people who have an abortion each year,” Foster said. “But I do think within our practice and within the shield law space we are anticipating that there will continue to be growth in demand.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian