A map, a myth and a pre-Incan lagoon: the man who brought water back to a drought-ridden town

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Historian Revives Ancient Water Management System in Drought-Stricken Ecuadorian Town"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In 1983, historian Galo Ramón stumbled upon a hand-drawn map from 1792 depicting an ancient lagoon in his hometown of Catacocha, Ecuador. This discovery catalyzed a journey to revive a long-forgotten water management system created by the Paltas, a pre-Incan civilization that thrived in the region over a millennium ago. Ramón's research revealed that the Paltas had ingeniously developed a system to collect and manage rainwater, groundwater, and runoff, allowing them to sustain agriculture and domestic water supply even in periods of drought. This ancient system was characterized by the creation of artificial wetlands at high altitudes, which facilitated water infiltration and aquifer recharge. Ramón’s findings highlighted not only the ingenuity of the Paltas but also underscored the critical need for such sustainable practices in modern times, particularly in a region plagued by erratic rainfall patterns exacerbated by climate change and human activity.

With the support of Comunidec, a human rights foundation, Ramón initiated the restoration of the Paltas' water management system in 2005. Over the years, the project led to the construction of numerous lagoons and small dams, which have significantly increased water availability for the local population, transforming Catacocha from a place where residents received only half an hour of water per day to one where water is accessible for up to ten hours daily. This revival of traditional practices not only improved water security but also bolstered food security through community gardens. Despite these successes, Ramón and local advocates face challenges in garnering governmental support for the broader application of these ancient techniques. They argue that such sustainable and low-cost solutions could provide immediate benefits in combating water scarcity throughout Ecuador, emphasizing the importance of integrating ancestral knowledge into contemporary water management strategies.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the remarkable journey of Galo Ramón, a historian who revived an ancient water management system in Ecuador. His research into a historical map led him to rediscover a lagoon system created by the pre-Incan Paltas civilization, which has helped address severe water scarcity in the region. This narrative not only emphasizes environmental regeneration but also showcases the potential for historical knowledge to solve contemporary problems.

Objectives of the Article

The primary aim of this article is to shed light on innovative solutions to modern water scarcity by drawing from historical practices. By illustrating Ramón's efforts, it seeks to inspire communities facing similar challenges and advocate for sustainable practices in water management.

Public Perception and Community Impact

The article is likely to foster a sense of hope and empowerment within communities that struggle with water scarcity. It highlights the importance of indigenous knowledge and historical practices, reinforcing the idea that solutions can come from within local cultures rather than solely from modern technology or external interventions.

Concealed Information

While the article focuses on the positive outcomes of Ramón's work, it may inadvertently downplay ongoing challenges that the region faces, such as political or economic factors that contribute to water scarcity. By not addressing these complexities, the article may present an overly optimistic view of the situation.

Manipulative Potential

The article's potential for manipulation lies in its narrative style, which emphasizes success and regeneration without sufficiently exploring the socio-political context of water management in Ecuador. This could lead readers to overlook the broader systemic issues that contribute to water scarcity.

Credibility Assessment

The article appears credible, as it references historical research and the tangible results of Ramón's work. However, the lack of discussion on challenges and external factors may limit its reliability as a comprehensive account of the situation.

Societal Implications

This narrative could influence public policy by encouraging investments in historical and indigenous practices for water management. It may also promote environmental awareness and community engagement in sustainable practices.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to environmentalists, historians, and community activists interested in sustainable development and indigenous practices. It speaks to those who value local knowledge and are looking for innovative solutions to pressing global issues.

Market Impact

In terms of market implications, this story could influence investments in sustainable technologies and water management solutions. Companies involved in environmental conservation or sustainable agriculture may find opportunities for growth in regions facing similar challenges.

Global Relevance

The themes presented in the article resonate with ongoing global discussions about water scarcity and sustainability. The revival of ancient practices could contribute to broader movements advocating for sustainable resource management in the face of climate change.

AI Involvement

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in the writing of this article, as it presents a personal narrative and historical account that requires human insight and empathy. However, AI could assist in data analysis or research for similar stories.

Manipulation Analysis

The article’s optimistic tone and focus on success could be seen as a form of manipulation, as it may lead readers to overlook ongoing issues. The language used emphasizes positive outcomes while neglecting the complexities of the situation.

In conclusion, while the article presents a compelling narrative of environmental regeneration through historical knowledge, it may not fully encompass the broader challenges related to water management. The focus on a singular success story can create a sense of hope but may also result in an incomplete understanding of the issues at hand.

Unanalyzed Article Content

One day in 1983, while studying a hand-drawn map from 1792 of his home town inEcuador, Galo Ramón, a historian, came across a dispute between a landowner and two local Indigenous communities, the Coyana and the Catacocha. The boundary conflict involved an ancient lagoon, depicted on the map.

“The drawing depicted a lagoon brimming with rainwater,” says Ramón. Ravines were depicted forming below the high-altitude lagoon, indicating that it supplied watersheds further down – contrary to the typical flow where a watershed feeds into the lagoon.

Ramón had discovered a long-forgotten ancient water management system conceived bythe Paltas, a pre-Incan civilisationthat inhabited the semi-arid region more than 1,000 years ago.

Ramón set out to recreate the Paltas’ lagoon system and, 40 years on, the region has enjoyed an environmental regeneration, offering solutions for Ecuador – which regularlyfaces severe droughts– and other parts of the world struggling to address water scarcity with limited resources.

Galo Ramón was born in Catacocha, southernEcuador, in 1952, a time when access to water for drinking and irrigation was unreliable. As a young man, he moved to Quito for university and to pursue his career as a historian. Eventually, he directed his research towards the history of the Paltas canton in Catacocha’s province of Loja.

“I was born in Paltas, where people have very little water. Although I don’t live there any more, I was eager to contribute with my knowledge,” he says.

When Ramón began his research in Catacocha, an urban area with a population of 8,000, people barely had half an hour of water a day. “People here live in constant insecurity about the chances of rain,” says Ramón.

The region has highly variable rainfall patterns due to its location at the convergence of two ocean currents – the Humboldt and South Equatorial.When the Humboldt current predominates, there is minimal rainfall, averaging about 300mm (12in) to 400mm a year. Approximately every seven years, when an El Niño occurs – warming sea surface temperatures – annual rainfall can rise to 4-5 metres.

In years with consistent rainfall, most of it occurs in just one or two months, with about70% falling in March and April. During this period, there are usually three to five intense tropical storms, when up to 850mm of rainfall can occur in the region – more than in many other parts of the country.

But as the region has very steep, rocky and irregular soil with poor permeability, water rapidly runs off and waterways tend to dry out. From May to December, the region experiences no rain, strong winds and intense sunlight, which cause soil erosion and reduce moisture in the soil. Still, the Paltas people not only managed to survive but thrive in this environment.

“So I began a historical investigation into the Paltas, including a series of Indigenous myths that still survive,” says Ramón, “as that, it seemed to me, could offer modern solutions to the problem of drought.”

Ramón discovered that designs for the Pisaca lagoon were recorded in maps, wills, accounts of land disputes, property titles and interviews.

He realised the Paltas had developed a system for sowing and harvesting water that involved collecting and infiltrating rainwater, groundwater and underground runoff (sowing) to recover it later when it reappeared in springs and wells downstream (harvesting).

That system enabled the Paltas to regulate water flows and store water in aquifers for domestic use and irrigation during periods of drought. “The springs tend to increase significantly during the rainy months and then dry out by August due to poor soil permeability. Without the Paltas’ system, water runoff is rapid, so you don’t have a permanent source to feed the spring,” Ramón says.

The main element of this system is the artificial lentic – or still water – wetland (cochain Quechua) created at high altitudes to collect rainwater during the rainy months. The Paltas built these lagoons on fractured rocky terrain – the permeability of the pond bottoms allowed for slow water infiltration and aquifers to recharge.

“Then they planted hydrophilic plants inside the lagoon, which developed roots that helped retain the water, slowing infiltration so that the lagoon could last all year,” says Ramón.

As hydrophilic plants cover the surface of the lagoon, they also prevent excessive water evaporation. The Paltas also observed zones where plants retained their leaves even in the driest months of the year due to higher levels of soil moisture. This made it possible to follow the direction of the subsurface flow in the shallow aquifer.

“The leaves are green because the aquifer is right below. So the Paltas observed that line of greenery in the dry months and were able to place the lagoons perfectly,” says Ramón.

The Paltas also built small dams along rivers to control runoff during the rainy season, which infiltrated downstream, creating a wet microsystem that maintained soil moisture. They also cared for headwater forests that captured moisture from the mist and planted vegetation on slopes to reduce erosion and surface runoff.

More than50 species of trees, shrubs and groundcover plantsemulating forest biodiversity enhanced the system, helping the Paltas retain water in their fields.

Ramón and his colleagues noted the remains of those systems during fieldwork and interviewed local people, collecting stories and traditions.

That was when Ramón deciphered the meaning of an Indigenous myth, that of “touro Cango” (Cango the bull), he had heard as a child.

“The myth said that the bull lived in Catacocha while there were lakes, as he liked the grass that only grew in them. If there were no grass, he would not eat,” says Ramón. “This means that when the lakes disappeared, the bull disappeared too.”

The grasses that Cango the bull ate were hydrophilic plants essential to the wetland. “Little by little, the ancient water-management system described in myths, documents, petroglyphs and stone carvings was aligned as a coherent whole,” says Ramón.

Sign up toGlobal Dispatch

Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team

after newsletter promotion

The Paltas’ system faded from memory during the early 18th-century Spanish colonial period due to a decline in the Indigenous population from diseases such as smallpox and measles, landowners expanding their properties and the Catholic church draining lakes linked to pre-Christian rituals.

The land was eventually given over to cattle and sugar cane. Even gardens were abandoned because of a lack of water, which increased food insecurity. Pisaca lagoon was the last to dry out, less than a century ago.

As a result of the disappearance of the Paltas’ lagoon system, the Catacocha aquifers and springs became depleted, and water was available for only half an hour a day by 2001.

In 2005, Ramón, who by then was the leader ofComunidec, a human rights foundation, decided to rebuild the Paltas’ lagoon system.

Estefanía Maldonado, a constitutional rights lawyer who became involved with the foundation from the outset, says their goal at that stage was to empower peasant communities and civil society.

Vilma Collaguazo, 44, who lives in Catacocha, began attending project meetings and workshops early on. She remembers that when she first heard of the plan, she didn’t believe it would work. “We had no idea how the lagoons were going to fill up, given that they were so big,” she says.

Comunidec secured resources, and the project began with the restoration of the lagoon on the eastern slopes of Pisaca mountain between 2005 and 2008. It is now the largest, with a storage capacity of 78,420 cubic metres.

“By the end of 2005, there were some hefty rains and the lagoons were filled,” Collaguazo recalls.

“Since then, there was water almost year-round in the springs, and even new springs emerged. People had water to drink and for their crops, so we began to believe again.”

In 2010, theNature and Culture International Foundationand bought 406 hectares (1,000 acres) of land around Pisaca, supported by Comunidec, to create a reserve, remove cattle and use the land to maintain the water system permanently.

By 2013, 28 lagoons had been built, as well as other elements of the water management system, such astajamares(small dams or weirs) and water reservoirs, that had been part of the landscape more than 1,000 years ago.

Since then, local people have reforested the area with native plants that reduce water evaporation, conserve moisture and protect the slopes. The project has increased Catacocha’s water availability from one to 10 hours daily and enhanced food security through community gardens, resulting in the creation of 250 lagoons and tajamares.

Antonio Díaz, who has been involved with the project since 2005, has reaped the benefits. “I live not far from the Pisaca lagoon and have plenty of water for my little garden and my animals,” he says. “It is truly a good thing.”

Despite its success in reducing water scarcity and food insecurity, successive governments in Ecuador have not been persuaded to invest in rebuilding the systems.

“Perhaps politicians don’t see that it is an investment that will yield immediate returns,” Ramón says. “This year it rained little, so the hydroelectric plants lack water. When it rains, there is no runoff management. Ancient techniques allow you to do just that and could be a solution for all of Ecuador.”

Collaguazo believes that Catacocha demonstrates how water scarcity can be addressed with positive environmental outcomes and without significant investment.

“Water is a constitutional right for all. Yet, how do you provide it to a rural community that may be in debt and lack the cashflow to carry out projects?” she asks.

“We don’t necessarily need monumental projects to have water. We can also do it by recovering ancestral knowledge.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian