‘A lot of Russians have been killed. We like this’: on the frontline with a Ukrainian artillery unit

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Ukrainian Artillery Units Engage Russian Forces Amid Ongoing Conflict in Northeast Ukraine"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the midst of ongoing conflict in northeast Ukraine, Ukrainian artillery units are actively engaged in halting Russian advancements near the Oskil River. The artillery team, led by commander Serhii, employs Soviet-era howitzers to target Russian logistics and prevent the enemy from crossing the river. The situation has escalated since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022, with Dvorichna changing hands multiple times. Currently, Russians are attempting to establish a bridgehead to secure the R79 highway, which is crucial for their supply lines. Ukrainian forces have reported significant success in disrupting Russian reinforcements, with heavy losses inflicted on enemy troops and their equipment. The Ukrainian artillerymen express a grim satisfaction in their effectiveness, noting the high casualties among Russian soldiers, which they view as a tactical victory in the brutal landscape of warfare that has transformed the region into a zone of devastation and despair.

The humanitarian situation in the area is dire, with local officials reporting continuous bombardments and civilian casualties. Mayor Andriy Besedin of Kupiansk highlights the relentless attacks on the district, which have resulted in multiple deaths and injuries among the remaining residents. Despite the chaos and destruction, a small number of civilians have chosen to stay, enduring the lack of basic necessities and the constant threat of violence. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy acknowledges the challenging circumstances faced by his forces while criticizing international peace efforts as inadequate. As both sides prepare for potential escalations in summer offensives, the dynamic of the conflict continues to evolve, with drone technology playing an increasingly pivotal role. Soldiers on the front line express their determination to counter Russian advances, emphasizing the necessity of inflicting maximum casualties to protect their territory and people from further aggression.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a vivid account of a Ukrainian artillery unit engaged in combat against Russian forces in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Through the description of the artillery operations and the strategic significance of the Oskil River, the piece offers insight into the intensity of the conflict and the ongoing military tactics being employed by both sides.

Purpose Behind Publication

The narrative aims to convey the bravery and determination of the Ukrainian forces while highlighting the challenges they face against Russian advancements. By emphasizing the successful destruction of Russian logistics and personnel, the article serves to bolster morale among Ukrainian supporters and the international community, reinforcing the notion that Ukraine is actively resisting and countering Russian aggression.

Perception Creation

The article likely seeks to create a sense of resilience and hope among the Ukrainian populace and its supporters. By showcasing the tactical successes of the Ukrainian artillery unit, it aims to foster a perception of strength and persistence in the face of adversity, which can inspire continued support both domestically and internationally.

Potential Concealments

There may be elements of the broader conflict that are not addressed in the article, such as the humanitarian impact of the ongoing fighting or the complexities of military strategy that could affect civilian populations. By focusing on military successes, the article may downplay the potential consequences of prolonged conflict on the civilian population and infrastructure.

Manipulative Nature Assessment

The article can be considered somewhat manipulative due to its selective focus on military achievements while omitting the broader context of the war's impact. This could lead to a skewed understanding of the situation, as it emphasizes a narrative of victory without addressing the full scope of the conflict's ramifications.

Truthfulness of the Content

While the article appears to be grounded in factual military details and eyewitness accounts, the presentation is inherently biased towards a Ukrainian perspective. This bias may affect the perceived reliability of the information, as it aims to promote a specific narrative.

Community Impact

The portrayal of the Ukrainian forces as resilient and effective can galvanize support for the military effort both domestically and internationally. The article may contribute to increased donations, volunteer enlistments, or political support for Ukraine, influencing the social and political landscape surrounding the conflict.

Target Audience

This piece is likely aimed at a broad audience that includes military enthusiasts, individuals interested in geopolitics, and those sympathetic to the Ukrainian cause. It seeks to resonate with communities that support Ukraine's sovereignty and resistance against invasion.

Market Influence

In terms of financial markets, news highlighting military successes could lead to fluctuations in stock prices related to defense contractors or companies involved in reconstruction efforts in Ukraine. Investors may respond positively to perceived military victories, impacting shares of relevant companies.

Global Power Dynamics

The article reflects the ongoing tensions between Russia and Ukraine, which have broader implications for global geopolitical stability. The narrative aligns with current themes of resistance against authoritarianism and the necessity of international support for democratic nations.

Artificial Intelligence Utilization

While it’s unclear if AI tools were used in crafting this article, certain elements such as data analysis or fact-checking could have been aided by AI models. The narrative style, however, suggests a human touch that reflects personal experiences and observations, possibly limiting the role of AI in shaping the story.

Manipulative Language

The language used in the article can be seen as manipulative, particularly in how it frames the Ukrainian forces' actions as heroic while portraying the adversary in a negative light. This choice of words contributes to a narrative that seeks to unify support against a common enemy.

Examining the article reveals its intent to shape public perception of the conflict in a way that emphasizes Ukrainian resilience and military effectiveness while potentially obscuring the broader complexities and consequences of war.

Unanalyzed Article Content

From a line of trees the Ukrainian gun team prepared to fire. An artilleryman, Yurii, loaded a 152mm shell into an old Soviet-made howitzer. “We are ready!” Yurii said. He moved away from the barrel. “Fire!” the unit’s commander replied. There was an almighty boom.

White smoke filled the dugout, which was hidden beneath camouflage nets and cut pine branches. From the undergrowth, a chiffchaff resumed its spring warbling.

Nearby, in the north-east of Ukraine, Russian troops were trying to advance. In February 2022 theyrolled in to the town of Dvorichnaat the beginning of Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion. Six months later Ukraine’s armed forces pushed them out as part of a successful counteroffensive in the Kharkiv region. In January, the Russians came back and occupied Dvorichna for a second time.

The battle is taking place on either side of the picturesque Oskil River. Before the war, it was a place for recreation. Visitors would grill kebabs on its sandy beaches or go kayaking past a ridge of low chalk hills and a small national park. Now it is a zone of war, waged by drones, artillery and bombs. The Russians are trying to expand a slender bridgehead on the river’s right bank, near Dvorichna.

Their goal is to seize the R79 highway leading tothe railway hub of Kupiansk, immediately to the south – and, after that, to encircle Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second city.

“Our task is to stop them from crossing the river. We do this by firing at their logistics in the rear,” explained Serhii, an artillery captain with the 1st or “Burevii” brigade of Ukraine’s national guard.

Over the past two months, the Russians had scaled back their attempt to bring reinforcements across the Oskil, Serhii said, because of heavy losses. As soon as Russian engineering teams build pontoon bridges his battery destroys them, he added. Video shows how three Russianarmoured personnel carriers were hit. They sank. Others got stuck on the bank and were finished off by kamikaze drones.

The corpses of Russians soldiers lay around. “Sometimes they collect their dead. Sometimes not. Dogs eat their remains,” Yurii – the artilleryman – said matter-of-factly. He added: “A lot of Russians have been killed. We like this.”

Fighting takes place across a landscape of fields and broken copses, shredded by repeated shelling. Green foliage and blossom makes it easier for both sides to conceal their technical equipment.

Tactics have changed, Serhii said. The Russians had abandoned big military columns and were sending groups of infantry to the frontline on innovative forms of transport. These included armoured fighting vehicles – “three or four at a time” – motorcycles, quad bikes, golf buggies and civilian cars. “Often they take a position. We counterattack and get it back. It’s back and forth. There’s no significant advance,” he said.

Despite US attempts to negotiate an end to hostilities, the Kremlin is still trying to grab more territory. On Monday, Putin announced a ceasefire to coincide with Victory Day and a parade in Red Square celebrating the Soviet Union’s defeat in the second world war of Nazi Germany. Ukrainian commentators pointed out he had announced a similar truce over Easter only to massively violate it.

Last autumn Russiamade military gains. Recently its progress has slowed. The main thrust is in the industrial eastern Donetsk region. In one city,Pokrovsk, Ukraine’s troops have stabilised the frontline. In another, Kostyantynivka, the Russians creep forward. Putin appears determined to seize the entireoblast,ignoring Donald Trump’s plea: “Vladimir, stop!”

The US president’s solution to the conflictincludes giving Crimeaand four eastern Ukrainian regions to Moscow. Ukrainian soldiers said this would create a disastrous geopolitical precedent. One observed: “It would legitimise the redistribution of territory by force and open a Pandora’s box around the world. Putin would go on to attack the Baltics, Finland or Moldova. It’s our country and state. It’s not up to Trump to decide where our borders lie.”

Russia’s latest assault has brought fresh misery to a population that had already experienced occupation. In 2022 Russian troops entered Dvorichna quickly, leaving it mostly intact. After intense recent fighting it has become a wasteland. According to survivors, Russian soldiers arrived just after new year. They opened fire on the handful of civilians who were still living in the ruined town and sheltering in basements.

One of them, Yevhen, said his neighbour Volodymyr was badly injured. There was no medicine. He died 10 days later of his wounds. Yevhen said he and two neighbours carried Volodymyr’s body up from a cellar but did not have time to dig a grave. They left him next to a woodshed. The trio waited until the soldiers disappeared and escaped, walking 4 miles to the Ukrainian-controlled village of Kutkivka.

Andriy Besedin,the mayor of Kupiansk, said the district was under continual fire. This month there have been 1,500 attacks from shells, mortars and airstrikes, he said. Five people have been killed and 35 injured. On Saturday a surgeon was wounded when a Russian drone targeted his car. The same day a bomb dropped by a plane killed an 88-year-old man and damaged several houses.

About 750 residents were still living on the left bank of the Oskil, right next to the frontline, Besedin said. The Russians were 1.5 miles away. “We have told our people to leave. They refuse. They have no gas, water, communications, hospital, or communal services,” he said. Besedin was optimistic Kupiansk could hang on, despite daily bombardment. “We believe in our armed forces,” he declared.

Other soldiers said they expected Moscow to launch a large summer offensive – based on a “gut feeling”, as one put it. This week, Russia’s defence ministry said it had fully recaptured the Kursk region, where Ukraine’s armed forces in August launched a mini-invasion. The Kremlin is expected to increase its attacks on the adjacent province and city of Sumy.A Russian missile recently hitSumy’s centre, killing 35 people.

On SundayVolodymyr Zelenskyyacknowledged the situation was difficult across the frontline. “Fighting continues. The occupier continues its offensive attempts,” the president wrote on social media. Global pressure on Russia to bring the war to an end was “not sufficient”, he added. Moscow had snubbed a proposal by Washington for a “full and comprehensive ceasefire”, which Kyiv accepted in March, he pointed out.

A drone operator with the first brigade, Alex, confirmed that the Russians were not letting up. “As soon as they see a weakness they take what they can get,” he said. “The dynamic we see now is that Russia’s advance is rather slow. But it is perceptible. If we don’t do something to counteract it they will inch forward. Our plan on a local level is to kill as many of them as possible until they have nobody to throw at us.”

Alex called the US’s peace efforts “pretty disappointing”. “It’s easy to put pressure on a Ukraine that’s on the back foot, rather than on Russia,” he remarked. Zelenskyy faced a predicament, he added. He could agree to Trump’s Moscow-friendly deal, knowing that Putin would soon “try again” with another attack on Ukraine. Or Zelenskyy could refuse, and see himself blamed by the Americans and Russian propaganda.

Nearby, other soldiers were customising drones in a workshop. They included surveillance models fitted with thermal cameras and mine-dropping “bombers”. Both sides areusing fibre-optic drones, which are immune to electronic warfare counter-measures. “The war has changed. In 2014 there were no drones. In 2022 there were very few of them,” said one soldier Roman with the call-sign “Cedar”. “Now they are everywhere.”

People in the town of Shevchenkove said they didn’t want to live under Russian rule again. “They were here for six months. We had to ask permission to fetch water,” Luda Yermolenko said, sitting with her neighbours on a bench next to her cottage under a cherry tree. “Most civilians were OK, but they killed a mother and her son.” She added: “We hope our army can hold this place.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian