A Moon for the Misbegotten review – even Ruth Wilson can’t redeem this long night

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Rebecca Frecknall's Production of 'A Moon for the Misbegotten' Reveals Dated Themes and Uneven Pacing"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Rebecca Frecknall's production of Eugene O'Neill's final play, 'A Moon for the Misbegotten,' offers a straightforward interpretation that highlights the play's age and inherent issues. The three-hour performance, while faithful to the text, suffers from a slow tempo and fails to build the necessary tension, leading to an anti-climactic conclusion. The plot centers around dissolute farmer Phil Hogan, who devises a scheme for his daughter Josie to seduce the wealthy landlord James Tyrone in an attempt to blackmail him and secure their farm. As Josie and James navigate a moonlit night filled with flirtation and conflict, the production struggles to maintain its momentum, often circling the plot without reaching any significant revelations until the final moments. While Ruth Wilson delivers a captivating performance as Josie, the characters themselves seem to oscillate between melodrama and tragedy, with their psychological development hindered by lengthy monologues.

The underlying themes of female sexuality and societal perception are pervasive throughout the play, as Josie's character is shaped by the men around her who view her as either a threat or a means to an end. The dialogue, which often objectifies women, contributes to an uncomfortable atmosphere that feels outdated in today's context. Despite the potential for deeper exploration of Josie's character, her narrative arc becomes overshadowed by James's emotional turmoil and his problematic views on women. The set design, described as stagnant, further detracts from the overall experience. While Frecknall's direction has been criticized for being overly restrained, a more dynamic approach may have allowed for a fresh perspective on this classic work. The production runs at the Almeida Theatre in London until August 16, providing audiences with an opportunity to engage with O'Neill's themes, albeit in a way that feels uncomfortably dated at times.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Rebecca Frecknall has given some surprising spins to the American canon with her refreshing and untraditional revivals. The surprise in the director’s production of Eugene O’Neill’s final play is that it is served up straight.

Frecknall has stepped back to let the play do the speaking but this faithfulness lays bare the datedness of the drama, which creaks with age at times. The production itself seems imbalanced too: glacial in pace, it stretches across three hours, not gathering enough intensity and chugging anti-climactically to its end.

Dissolute farmer Phil Hogan (David Threlfall) dreams up a scheme for his daughter, Josie (Ruth Wilson), to seduce the wealthy landlord James Tyrone (Michael Shannon) as a ploy to blackmail him and keep the farm from being sold to a neighbour. So Josie and James spend a moonlit night together, flirting, drinking, arguing and proclaiming love which may or may not be real. An hour in, it feels as if the play is simply circling its plot rather than arriving at its purpose. More than two hours later, Josie and James’s relationship reveals some vulnerability.

Wilson is, as always, magnetic in her stage presence, in farm-hand dungarees with the hint of Irishness to her American accent, while Threlfall is convincing as the bullish, wayward father. But characters hover between the roguish, melodramatic and tragic, speaking in scheming monologues which arrest psychological development. Tom Scutt’s set design looks stagnant under a beige wash of timber, planks and ladders, the inside of the farm wall-less but without the intrigue this exposure might bring.

As inLong Day’s Journey Into Night(to which this play is a sequel), illusion wrestles with truth, reality and revelation: James is a city type who drinks heavily and reveals deeper, mournful dimensions; Josie has a brazen reputation about town (the “scandal of the countryside”) but one of the mysteries of the plot lies around her sexual virtue. Her story feels oddly – jarringly – eclipsed by James’s outpouring of grief and guilt, along with his glaring madonna/whore fantasy, which shapes their dynamic.

Female sexuality as a whole is defined by the men around Josie either as threat or currency with which to bargain for advantage. Josie’s breasts are casually, repeatedly, admired and women are referred to as sluts and pigs. While this may be of its world – an early 20th-century hardscrabble farm community in Connecticut – it gives the play an old-fashioned, queasy feel. The drama ends with what seems like Josie’s transformation into a would-be saviour for the suffering man that James embodies. “Mother me, Josie, I love it,” he says, and she obliges. Is O’Neill suggesting this was Josie’s moral lesson to learn?

Perhaps not, but too much of the play creaks with what feel like anachronisms. Frecknall is sometimes charged with being too overbearing a director but this production might have benefited from bigger, bolder revisionism.

At theAlmeida theatre, London, until 16 August

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian