65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Art – a grand, disturbing and provocative exhibition

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"New Exhibition at Potter Museum Explores 65,000 Years of Aboriginal Art"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Potter Museum of Art at the University of Melbourne has launched a thought-provoking exhibition titled '65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Art', which aims to shed light on the often-overlooked significance of Aboriginal art. Curated by Marcia Langton, Judith Ryan, and Shanysa McConville, the exhibition asserts that Aboriginal art should not be viewed through an ethnographic lens but rather as a legitimate and powerful form of artistic expression. Historically, Aboriginal art has been undervalued and dismissed as 'primitive' or 'folk art', relegated to the margins of galleries and museums. The exhibition features a range of masterworks, some by renowned artists like Emily Kam Kngwarray and Albert Namatjira, alongside pieces from unnamed artists whose contributions have often gone unrecognized. The curators have intentionally placed female artists at the forefront of the exhibition, highlighting their vital role in sustaining cultural practices. This focus is complemented by a collection of woven works and significant pieces that address the complexities of colonial history, setting the stage for a deeper understanding of the art's context.

The exhibition navigates through the darker aspects of Australian history, confronting the violence and dispossession faced by Indigenous peoples. One of the most striking sections, labeled the 'dark heart', critiques the pseudoscientific underpinnings of eugenics, closely tied to the university's historical legacy. This room serves as a stark reminder of the colonial mindset that justified the exploitation of Aboriginal peoples. In contrast, the upper floors of the exhibition celebrate the resilience of Indigenous culture, showcasing contemporary works that emphasize a connection to the cosmos and the ongoing narrative of survival and reclamation. Artists like Kaylene Whiskey reinterpret traditional stories through a modern lens, reinforcing the idea that Aboriginal art is not static but an evolving dialogue with the past. Overall, '65,000 Years' is a compelling exploration of Aboriginal art, revealing its depth and relevance while calling for greater recognition and appreciation of its historical and contemporary significance.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The exhibition titled "65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Art" is a significant event at the University of Melbourne's Potter Museum of Art, aiming to reclaim and celebrate Aboriginal art, which has historically been undervalued. The presentation of this exhibition sheds light on the evolution of perceptions surrounding Aboriginal art and seeks to position it within the broader narrative of Australian culture.

Historical Context and Significance

The article emphasizes the long-standing tradition of Aboriginal art, highlighting that it has been criminally underappreciated until recently. This narrative serves to provoke a critical reflection on historical biases toward Indigenous art forms, framing them as "primitive" rather than acknowledging their complexity and cultural significance. The intention behind this exhibition is to elevate Aboriginal art from an ethnographic perspective to one of artistic merit, challenging previous misconceptions.

Curation and Artistic Representation

Curators Marcia Langton, Judith Ryan, and Shanysa McConville have made deliberate choices in selecting pieces for the exhibition, showcasing both renowned artists and lesser-known works. This curated approach aims to underscore the depth and diversity of Aboriginal art, particularly emphasizing the contributions of female artists. By placing women at the center of the exhibition, the curators aim to highlight their vital role in sustaining cultural practices.

Societal Impact and Perception

The article suggests that the exhibition's presentation, with its "darkly ironic" title, is designed to provoke thought and discussion within the community about the value of Indigenous art. By drawing attention to the historical neglect of these artworks, the exhibition seeks to foster a greater appreciation and understanding among audiences, potentially influencing societal perceptions of Aboriginal culture.

Potential Manipulation and Agenda

While the exhibition aims to celebrate and elevate Aboriginal art, one could argue that the framing of this narrative may also serve to distract from ongoing issues faced by Indigenous communities. By focusing on art, the discussion may inadvertently sidestep broader socio-political challenges. The article’s language, which emphasizes the "power and dignity" of Aboriginal art, could be seen as a strategic choice to evoke emotional responses and support for Indigenous rights and recognition.

Credibility and Trustworthiness

The information presented appears credible, supported by the voices of respected figures in the academic and art communities. However, the exhibition's framing and the language used may lead to interpretations that suggest a specific agenda. The emphasis on reclaiming art and identity is a powerful narrative but could also be viewed as selectively highlighting aspects of Indigenous culture while neglecting pressing contemporary issues.

In conclusion, the article discusses the significance of the exhibition and its potential to reshape perceptions of Aboriginal art. The focus on artistic merit over ethnographic classification is a notable shift that aligns with broader movements toward recognition of Indigenous cultures. However, the underlying motivations and implications of such narratives warrant careful consideration.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The opening exhibition at the University of Melbourne’s newly refurbished Potter Museum of Art has been given a darkly ironic and deliberately provocative title:65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Art. While there is a vast and storied tradition of Aboriginal art, its power and dignity have been criminally under appreciated and devalued until only recently.

For most of the 20th century “this work was considered primitive”, says the renowned academic and co-curator of the exhibition, Marcia Langton. The central point of 65,000 Years is declamatory, a forceful demonstration that “this is not an ethnographic collection”, she says. “It’s art.”

Given the international standing of Aboriginal art now, where works are hung in major galleries around the world and fetch prices in the millions, it seems bewildering that it was so debased for so long. In the book that accompanies the exhibition, Langton mentions several ethnographers who “recognised the aesthetic as well as the social and religious implications of the art they encountered”, including Karel Kupka and Ronald and Catherine Berndt. But they were exceptions: most collectors thought of the work as naive or “folk art”, and galleries and museums – where they displayed it at all – relegated it to backrooms and basements.

Langton and her fellow curators Judith Ryan and Shanysa McConville have organised 65,000 Years around several hero pieces or masterworks. Some are by renowned artists like William Barak, Albert Namatjira and Emily Kam Kngwarray, but many are by unnamed artists whose work was poorly catalogued at the time of acquisition. The opening void that connects the ground floor to the top contains woven works by unknown female artists, alongside three narrbong (or bush bags) by Wiradjuri artist Lorraine Connelly-Northey and a magnificent possum skin cloak by Mandy Nicholson. Langton “wanted women to be at the heart of the building, because women sustain life”.

The exhibition as a whole eschews prettiness and reassurance for something more honest and battle-worn; it grapples with the brutality and theft that underpins Australian colonial history with unflinching candour. Gordon Bennett’s Death of the ahistorical subject (up rode the troopers, a, b, c) takes details of a lithograph depicting a massacre of Kamilaroi mob at Slaughterhouse Creek and turns it into a dot-point cry of resistance and reclamation.Christopher Pease’s 4 Bedrooms, 2 Bathroomsdepicts an Edenic vision of pre-colonial life – superimposed with the floor plan of a new apartment, making the theft of land overt and contemporary.

Opening with a collection of works that deal powerfully but respectfully with the atrocities committed in lutruwita (Tasmania), the exhibition moves north through Australia as the viewer ascends the floors. There are rooms of bark paintings from north-eastern Arnhem Land and from Groote Eylandt in the Gulf of Carpentaria. These “tell the pre-British invasion story of the Dutch coming on their ships”, Langton explains, “as well as the Macassar praus [traditional Indonesian canoes] that were coming here for centuries before the British arrived”.

Many of the works in 65,000 Years represent complex and ongoing attempts to reconcile a history of colonial barbarity and murder with an indomitable Indigenous spirit of survival and custodianship. But perhaps the key space, at least as far as the University ofMelbourneitself is concerned, is the room labelled the “dark heart”. In it, contemporary Aboriginal artists interrogate the pseudoscientific and deeply racist history of eugenics, for which the university was an international centre.

“The point is to be offended,” Langton says of this room, which recreates the feeling of an early 20th century lab and includes an imposing portrait of Richard JA Berry, the university’s third professor of anatomy and one of the world’s leading eugenicists. The skull depicted on his desk may be a memento mori, but it also speaks of the horrors of a colonialist pedagogy, where the remains of Aboriginal people were looted, studied and boxed up for decades, all under the rubric of academia.

“A lot of government policies and white supremacist doctrine emanate from this pseudoscience,” Ryan says; she suggests a line can be drawn from Berry’s bogus study to the White Australia policy, the Stolen Generations and Black deaths in custody. McConville agrees, labelling this room “a call to arms”.

If the room is disturbing – more for its clinical, patrician atmosphere and scientific pretensions than any visceral horror it depicts – so is the history it interrogates. But while this “dark heart” of bones and instruments feels necessary, it isn’t indicative of the exhibition as a whole. It lacks the vibrancy of colour, the audacity and resilience, and the sheer joy of the artworks on display elsewhere.

Sign up toSaved for Later

Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips

after newsletter promotion

As the viewer reaches the top floors, past major works by Ginger Riley Munduwalawala and Mirdidingkingathi Juwarnda Sally Gabori, they reach a zenith of sorts; a space of astronomy, of stars and the night sky. Dominating one room arethe Tjanpi Desert Weavers’ lifesize sculptural figures of the Kungkarangkalpa (Seven Sisters), who leapt into the skies to escape a lecherous old man called Nyiru and transformed into the Pleiades. They tell a tale of pursuit and escape, of transformation and metamorphosis, that feels reminiscent of Ovid and Greek myth.

There is an expansiveness in these works that is often astonishing; they seem thoroughly uninterested in interiority or psychology in a western sense, championing the omniscient and universal over the solipsistic. Murrinhpatha artist Nym Bandak’s All the world is a case in point, with its vision of the universe under the cosmic order of the Rainbow Serpent; it includes the orbit of the sun and moon, the wet and dry seasons and the entire cycle of human life and death.

“This is what most people don’t understand,” Langton says. “Aboriginal art is conceptual art, it’s cosmological.”

65,000 Years looks to the future even while it maps the past, with more recent works by Trevor Nickolls, Harry J Wedge and Destiny Deacon illustrating the overtly activist leanings of contemporaryIndigenous art. A work like Kaylene Whiskey’s Seven Sistas story, painted on to a South Australian tourism road sign, playfully reimagines the seven sisters as pop culture figures like Whoopi Goldberg, Cher and Wonder Woman. Maximalist, intensely colourful and intrinsically interwoven with the artists’ lived experience, these works are no repudiation of past practices, but a consolidation and natural progression.

There are more than 400 works of art from First Nations artists in 65,000 Years, including rarely seen pieces from the University of Melbourne’s own collection, alongside 193 loans from 77 public and private lenders. And yet, it only touches the surface of this vast, ongoing tradition. While endlessly fascinating and deeply moving for non-Indigenous audiences, it is indispensable for the future development of Aboriginal artists, whose work integrates and builds on the legacy of their forebears – and Langton hopes it will lead to an explosion of creativity: “You can’t be what you can’t see, right?”

65,000 Years: A Short History of Australian Artis open at Potter Museum of Art until 22 November

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian