480 sheeps’ heads in jars: Dark Mofo opens with another gory provocation

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Dark Mofo Festival Features Controversial Installation of Embalmed Sheep Heads"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the basement of a former furniture store in Hobart's CBD, an installation by Trawulwuy artist Nathan Maynard titled "We threw them down the rocks where they had thrown the sheep" features 480 embalmed sheep heads displayed in specimen jars. The work is part of the Dark Mofo festival, which has returned after a year off for renewal. The unsettling installation consists of 24 racks with jars arranged in a grid, contrasting the meticulous display with the disturbing nature of the contents. The atmosphere is further intensified by the room's lighting, which intermittently shifts to a nightmarish red, enhancing the eerie ambiance. Maynard's work has drawn mixed reactions, particularly from the local Tasmanian Aboriginal community, who have expressed concerns about the festival's handling of sensitive historical themes. The installation references a dark chapter in Tasmania's history, the Cape Grim massacre, where white settlers killed Aboriginal people in retaliation for sheep losses, highlighting the violent legacy of colonialism in Australia.

The installation aims to provoke thought and discussion about the historical treatment of Aboriginal people, particularly regarding the commodification of their remains. Visitors enter through a nondescript door marked by a red cross, greeted by a warning about the potentially confronting nature of the artwork. The absence of explanatory text leaves much to interpretation, with some attendees leaving quickly upon seeing the installation. An audio track in the corridor leading to the exhibit features voices, including Maynard's, expressing condemnation of the historical injustices faced by Aboriginal people. The work seeks to educate non-Indigenous audiences about Tasmania's violent past and the ongoing issues related to the repatriation of First Nations remains. Maynard hopes the installation will prompt a deeper investigation into these uncomfortable historical truths, though its enigmatic presentation may challenge its effectiveness in conveying the intended message.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a detailed account of a provocative art installation at the Dark Mofo festival in Hobart. The installation, featuring 480 embalmed sheep's heads, raises questions about art, cultural sensitivity, and the ethics of representation. The presence of such a stark and unsettling exhibit is intended to provoke thought and discussion, but it also invites criticism, particularly from the local Aboriginal community.

Cultural Sensitivity and Critique

The installation by Nathan Maynard has received backlash from parts of the Tasmanian Aboriginal community. The criticism stems from a perceived insensitivity towards the history of violence and trauma experienced by Indigenous peoples. The choice of the quote by George Augustus Robinson, known for his role in the violent dispossession of Aboriginal people, further exacerbates these concerns. The opposition from community figures highlights a tension between artistic expression and the ethical implications of that expression.

Public Reaction and Impact

As visitors enter the exhibit, they are met with an unsettling ambiance created by dim lighting and the ominous presence of the sheep's heads. This deliberate discomfort serves the purpose of stimulating discussion about the themes of death, colonialism, and the representation of Indigenous trauma. However, it risks alienating some audiences who may find the presentation of such a visceral subject matter distasteful or exploitative.

Potential Manipulation and Media Influence

There is a possibility that the article's framing serves to provoke a specific reaction from readers, particularly those aligned with the Aboriginal community's sentiments. By highlighting the criticisms and controversies surrounding the installation, the article may be steering public opinion towards a more critical view of the festival's practices. The language used, emphasizing "gory fascination" and "tone-deaf marketing," could be seen as a means of eliciting an emotional response that aligns with a certain narrative.

Artistic Intent vs. Public Perception

The festival's history of controversial art, including past incidents that drew significant criticism, indicates a pattern of provocative choices aimed at challenging societal norms. However, this strategy can backfire if the intended message is lost in the shock value, potentially leading to public disillusionment with the festival itself. The juxtaposition of art with cultural trauma raises questions about who has the right to depict certain narratives and in what manner.

Broader Implications

In the context of the ongoing discussions about Indigenous rights and representation, this installation and the surrounding critique could influence public discourse and policy regarding cultural expression. The conversation initiated by such art can lead to greater awareness of historical injustices and the need for respectful engagement with Indigenous issues.

The article's reliability can be assessed through its sources and the balance of perspectives it presents. While it includes voices from the Aboriginal community, it may still lean towards sensationalism in its portrayal of the installation. Thus, while the facts presented are grounded in reality, the framing may serve specific agendas rather than providing a neutral account.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In the dimly-lit basement of a former furniture store in Hobart CBD, 480 embalmed sheep’s heads in specimen jars are arranged on industrial shelving units: 24 racks, each four shelves high and with five jars per shelf, in a neat grid. The fastidiousness of the presentation sits at odds with the inherent violence of the material; so do the expressions on most of the sheep’s faces, which range from serene to uncanny smiles.

As if to dispel any false sense of quietude, the room’s lighting periodically switches to nightmarish red.

This is We threw them down the rocks where they had thrown the sheep, an installation by Trawulwuy artist Nathan Maynard, part of this year’sDark Mofofestival – the first after the often controversial festival took a year off in favour of a “period of renewal”.

Maynard’s exhibition was the first announcement for the festival’s return, and it drew some scepticism from members of the local Tasmanian Aboriginal community at the time. When it was announced via ateaser postfeaturing the quote “What did you do with the bodies? – George Augustus Robinson, 1830”, Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage officer Fiona Hamilton criticised Dark Mofo’s “gory fascination with the pain of our people”. Academic Greg Lehman, a descendant of the Trawulwuy people of north-east Tasmania, compared the “ugly and tone-deaf” marketing of the project to the festival’s widely criticised 2021 commission by Spanish artist Santiago Sierra, who called for the donation of blood by First Nations people, in which to soak a union jack flag.

Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning

The festival cancelled Sierra’s work and apologised for the commission and their marketing of it, but its appetite for confronting – and gory – work is unabated.

Visitors enter the space via a nondescript doorway on Collins Street marked by a red cross; an invigilator at the entrance warns them that the artwork “may or may not be confronting”.

There’s no explanatory text or artist statement, and the artist agreed to only one interview, with the Indigenous-run paper Koori Mail – and on Thursday evening, the festival’s opening night, visitors navigated the installation with varying levels of bemusement. Some entered the basement, saw the grisly cargo, and turned around and exited; others got their phones out and took pictures.

When questioned by attenders, an invigilator at the room’s entrance gamely attempted to encapsulate the dark history that inspired the work, and the ongoing issues that motivated Maynard to create it.

“We threw them down the rocks where they had thrown the sheep” is a quote from the journals of George Augustus Robinson, Tasmania’s “Chief Protector of Aborigines” from 1839 to 1849. Robinson was recounting an anecdote told to him with “perfect indifference” by a perpetrator of one of the state’s worst massacres: on 10 February 1828, four convict shepherds ambushed a group of Aboriginals at Cape Grim, in the island’s north-west, shooting and driving about 30 of them off a 60-metre cliff, supposedly in retaliation for the destruction of about the same number of sheep. In his journal, Robinson wrote that he had issued the perpetrators a warning.

The Cape Grim massacre is one of many that took place in Lutruwita/Tasmania during a state-orchestrated genocidal campaign against the island’s First Peoples known as the Black War (1824-1832). Generally, there were no formal or legal consequences for white perpetrators.

Sign up toSaved for Later

Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips

after newsletter promotion

Maynard told the Koori Mail last month that the massacre was “just one example in this country of where white people valued sheep more than black human life”. In a statement to Guardian Australia, Dark Mofo’s cultural adviser, Caleb Nichols-Mansell, said the work “encourages a deeper investigation of the history, our shared pasts and an honest interrogation around these topics and themes that we typically avoid within arts and cultural settings”.

The presentation of the sheep’s heads in specimen jars points to a different kind of racist violence from the same era: the theft and trade of First Nations human remains, which occurred throughout Australia. These remains entered the private collections of white settlers and officials or were sold to museums and scientific institutions. The campaign for their repatriation has been running since the 1970s.

Meanwhile, just 200 metres from the basement where Maynard’s installation is held stands a statue of former governor Sir John Franklin, who is known to have collected the skulls of Aboriginal people.

For visitors unaware of this context, the only clue is an audio track that plays in the corridor leading to the basement, featuring two voices – one Maynard’s – expressing condemnation, anger and distress over the historical and continuing treatment of ancestral remains. It’s hard to hear these voices clearly, but among the lines that cut through is the indelible exhortation: “Imagine it was your mother or your grandmother who was collecting dust in a museum basement!”

Maynard told the Koori Mail he hoped the installation would educate non-Indigenous people on Tasmania’s violent past. It remains to be seen whether the work’s enigmatic presentation will have the desired effect.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian